Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and
Physical Education to School
Relationship to Growth, Development, and Health
107
education classes should be designed to challenge
learners to develop their
motor skills.
In 1998 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s)
Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity organized a workshop to
determine future directions for research on physical activity. The work-
shop convened 21 experts from a wide range of academic disciplines. One
recommendation resulting from the proceedings was for future research to
describe the temporal relationship between motor development and physi-
cal activity (Fulton et al., 2001), signifying the importance of better under-
standing of the nature of the relationship between motor competence and
physical activity. The assumption of this relationship is implied in multiple
models of motor development (Seefeldt, 1980; Clark and Metcalfe, 2002;
Stodden et al., 2008), which emphasize the importance of motor compe-
tence as a prerequisite for engagement in physical activity throughout the
life span.
Two models that are commonly used to examine
this relationship are
Seefeldt’s (1980) hierarchical order of motor skills development and the
dynamic association model of Stodden and colleagues (2008). Seefeldt
proposed a hierarchical order of motor skills development that includes
four levels: reflexes, fundamental motor skills, transitional motor skills
(i.e., fundamental motor skills that are performed in various combinations
and with variations and that are required to participate in entry-level orga-
nized sports, such as throwing for distance, throwing for accuracy, and/or
catching a ball while in motion), and specific sports skills and dances. With
improved transitional motor skills, children
are able to master complex
motor skills (e.g., those required for playing more complex sports such as
football or basketball). At the end of this developmental period, children’s
vision is fully mature. The progression through each level occurs through
developmental stages as a combined result of growth, maturation, and
experience. Seefeldt hypothesized the existence of a “proficiency barrier”
between the fundamental and transitional levels of motor skills develop-
ment. If children are able to achieve a level of competence above the
proficiency barrier, they are more likely to continue to engage in physical
activity throughout the life span that requires the use of fundamental motor
skills. Conversely, less skilled children who do not exceed the proficiency
barrier will be less likely to continue to engage in physical activity. Thus,
it is assumed that “a confident and competent mover will be an active
mover” (Clark, 2005, p. 44). For example, to engage
successfully in a game
of handball, baseball, cricket, or basketball at any age, it is important to
reach a minimum level of competence in running, throwing, catching, and
striking. The assumption of the existence of a relationship between motor
competence and physical activity is at the “heart of our physical education
programs” (Clark, 2005, p. 44). A thorough understanding of how this