Utilization of Performance Enhancing Drug (peds) Should Not be Permitted in Sports

Counter arguments – criticize other opinion that Performance Enhance drug is allowed in any competition

There are a logical arguments that support PEDs consumption is allowed in any competition. First, removing the doping test and check would be save much time and save financial element. Second, It wouldn’t be ‘inequitable’, as each competitor experiencing similar access to same drugs. It could even make it comprehensive, individual ordinarily get the opportunity to be the top competitor as a result of ‘unjustifiable’ genetic advantages. So the individuals who regularly couldn’t keep up can utilize PEDs to compensate and stay competitive and also potentially it can make the games more fun, interesting and also elevate the limitation each competitor because of PEDs as the stimulant or catalyst for athlete’s body. World records continually being crushed, competitor being faster, stronger, more enduring. (Burnett Dean, 2016)

Besides of that, PEDs consumption would be beneficial to the business. As what Robinson stated, people are willing to pay great cash just to see the best competitors play. They do not care how costly the ticket. People will keep on watching since they are longing to see something unordinary. Because of the effect for using performance enhancing drugs as a stimulant or catalyst , the player would be more quicker, stronger. It makes the games worth watching.(Anderson Dave, 2015)