42
website (Park and Kim 2003), site involvement (Yusniza 2007, Mazaheri
et al.
2011) and
satisfaction (Park and Kim 2003, Choi
et al.
2004, Khalifa and Liu 2007, Bai
et al.
2008,
Park
et al.
2012 , Yen
et al.
2013) were also found to act as
critical determinants of
consumers’ online purchase intention and purchase behaviour.
Another important social/psychological variable that has received extensive attention from
scholars is perceived behavioural control, which refers to an individual’s perception of
her/his ability to perform a behaviour. Domina et al. (2012), Limayem et al. (2000), Shim et
al. (2001), and Lee (2009a, 2009b) suggested that perceived behavioural control positively
affects online shopping intention. Koufaris et al. (2001) pointed out that perceived control
increases the intention of new Web customers to return, but seemingly
does not influence
repeat customers to return.
Choi and Geistfeld (2004), Clemes et al. (2013), Limayem et al. (2000), Yulihasri (2011) and
Lee (2009a) maintained that the subjective norm of an individual (that is, perceptions of the
feasibility of a behaviour as evaluated by referent people) positively influences her/his
intention to purchase online, which, in turn, has a positive effect on the actual choice of
online shopping. Al-Maghrabi and Dennis (2011) indicated a positive effect of social
pressure on online continuance intention. Similarly, Blake et al. (2003) showed strong
evidence that the greater the prevalence of internet shopping among one’s social network, the
greater the frequency of online shopping. These findings were consistent with the TPB
(Ajzen 1991) and the Triandis’ Model (1980), which could be used
as guiding psychosocial
theories for research.
43
Innovativeness of consumers has received considerable attention in past research on
consumer behaviour (Hirschman 1980, Roehrich 2004, Kim
et al.
2012b, Truong 2013) in
light of its relevance as a factor in the adoption of a new product (Im
et al.
2003, Klink and
Athaide 2010) or a purchase behaviour (Citrin
et al.
2000). Innovativeness refers to the
degree to which an individual is receptive to new ideas (Chang
et al.
2005). Similar
dimensions of innovativeness included novelty (Huang 2000), trying something new (Raijas
2002) and being first to use new technology (Bellman
et al.
1999). However, the results for
the impacts of general innovativeness on online consumer behaviour were mixed. For
example, Donthu and Garcia (1999), Limayem et al. (2000) and Sin and Tse (2002)
confirmed a positive relationship between general innovativeness and purchase intention,
whilst Alka Varma et al. (2000), Citrin et al. (2000), Young and Stoel (2004) and Yusniza
(2007) claimed that such relationship appears insignificant in their studies.
In an attempt to
explain the divergent findings, some studies take the view that the
individual’s innovativeness should be domain-specific (regarding an area or a behaviour) and
not a general characteristic of the individual’s personality (Goldsmith 2002, Hoffmann and
Soyez 2010, San Martín and Herrero 2012). Goldsmith and Hofacker (1991) affirmed that
innovativeness should be considered specific to a domain. Although domain-specific
innovativeness is related to a general predisposition towards innovation, it is more predictive
of a particular behaviour than the general conception. Multiple researchers support this
hypothesis, highlighting the relevance of domain-specific innovativeness
as a determinant of
the adoption of a new product or behaviour (Agarwal and Prasad 1998, Hoffmann and Soyez
2010). The literature on e-commerce shows a predominance of the concept of innovativeness
as a domain-specific variable (Citrin
et al.
2000, Goldsmith 2000, Goldsmith 2001,
Goldsmith 2002). Many studies have concluded that domain-specific innovativeness has a
44
significant and positive association with intention and usage of online shopping (Alka Varma
et al.
2000, Goldsmith 2001, Goldsmith 2002, Blake
et al.
2003, Bigne-Alcaniz
et al.
2008,
San Martín and Herrero 2012).
In addition to innovativeness, other personality variables (e.g., risk aversion, disposition to
trust, and confidence) are reported to exert influences on online shopping behaviour. For
example, Donthu and Garcia (1999) demonstrated that consumers
who tend to minimize risk
(risk aversion) are less likely to buy online. In contrast, consumers who are willing to take
risks are more likely to buy online (Sim and Koi 2002, D'Alessandro
et al.
2012). Their study
echo Belanche et al.’s (2012b)
perspective that online shopping is riskier than traditional
shopping. Gefen (2000) noticed that the disposition to trust (a general inclination to display
faith in humanity and to adopt a trusting stance toward others) is positively correlated with
the adoption of online shopping. Also, McKnight et al. (2002) asserted that the willingness to
depend on a web vendor has a positive association with the intention to purchase online.
Hahn and Kim (2009) addressed the influence of perceived confidence
of shopping at an
online store on consumers’ behavioural intention toward the online store in a multi-channel
setting. The results revealed a significant and positive direct effect. However, the finding
contradicts the results of the study by Sin and Tse (2002) who claimed that confidence had no
significant impact on online behavioural intention.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: