127
1989 Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Technology Competitiveness
Act
To provide Federal assistance and leadership to
a program of research, development, and
demonstration of renewable energy and energy
efficiency technologies, and for other purposes.
Federal research,
development, and
demonstration programs
1990 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
To provide for reconciliation pursuant to
section 4 of the concurrent resolution on the
budget for fiscal year 1991
Extension of tax credit
1991 Tax Extension Act
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Extension of tax credit
2005
Energy Policy Act
To ensure jobs for our future with secure,
affordable, and reliable energy
Creation of tax credit
Loan guarantee
2006 Tax Relief and Health Care Act
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Extension of tax credit
2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
To provide incentives for energy production
and conservation
Extension of tax credit
2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act
To make supplemental
appropriations for job
preservation and creation, infrastructure
investment, energy efficiency and science,
assistance to the unemployed, and State and
local fiscal stabilization
Research grant
Loan guarantee
2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act
To make appropriations for military
construction, the Department of Veterans
Affairs, and related agencies
for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2016, and for other
purposes
Extension of tax credit
128
In 2012, a different type of solar policy from these policies was introduced. On
December 7, 2012, the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Department of
Commerce, issued a countervailing duty order on solar cells from China. The decision
was based on the determination of the International Trade Commission that an industry in
the U.S. is “materially injured by reason of imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic
cells and modules from China.”
130
Since SolarWorld and six other manufacturers
submitted petitions on October 19, 2011, the Department of Commerce has investigated
the case of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. On December 16, 2011,
the Department determined that the photovoltaic cells from
China have been sold in the
U.S. at less than fair value and subsidized by the Government of China.
On February 10, 2015, the International Trade Commission determined that an
industry in the U.S. is materially injured by the imports of solar cells from Taiwan as well
as China. Based on this determination, the Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on solar cells imported from Taiwan on February 18, 2015. The
investigation was initiated by the submission of another anti-dumping petition of
SolarWorld regarding the imports of solar cells and panels from Taiwan on December 31,
2013.
The tariff on the solar cells imported from China and Taiwan was different from
the solar policies described above in that it serves a different goal. The tariff was
determined to fix the “unfair” practices of international trade. In this sense, it is not
related to the original goal of the solar policies, which was to increase solar installation.
Rather, the tariff could be a barrier to achieve the goal because it increases the costs of
130
U.S.
Department of Commerce, “Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules
From China,” 77 Federal Register 235 (December 6, 2012)
129
solar products. The introduction of the tariff shows that the boundary of solar policies is
expanded to trade policies from energy policies.
Changes of the solar PV market environment
To understand the influence of the solar industry to solar policies, the recent
actions of the industry need to be investigated. Before describing the actions, the changes
of the external environment of the solar industry are explored in this section to better
understand the contexts of the actions of the industry.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: