182
T
HE
S
KILLFUL
T
EACHER
If these kinds of behavior continue I’m concerned that your credibil-
ity in the class will be completely destroyed. It would be a real shame
if class members closed their ears to your insights just because of
some unfortunate behaviors on your part of which you’re probably
unaware. So I’d like you to begin a self-conscious pattern of behav-
ior change when the class meets again next week. As a start, please
try to do the following things:
1. In any small-group exercise
in which you participate, don’t be the
reporter who gives an account of the group’s discussions to
the larger class.
2. When you’ve made a contribution in both the small- and large-
group discussions, please wait until at least three other people
have spoken before you talk again. You can forget this rule if
someone asks you a question directly.
3. For the next three weeks don’t crack jokes while other people are
making their group’s presentations to the whole class.
Let’s try this for three weeks and then
meet to talk about what each
of us thinks has been happening.
If anything I’ve said in this memo is unclear please feel free to call,
e-mail, or visit me personally to talk it over. My number is 651-962-
4982 and my e-mail address is sdbrookfield@stthomas.edu.
Both these evaluations would be hard for a student to take, leaving
him or her feeling threatened, not to say devastated. There is no
way to entirely anesthetize against the pain of receiving negative
instructor evaluations. But there are some important differences
between the two examples given. The
first evaluation probably
leaves the learner overwhelmed with feelings of shame and anger,
but with no sense of exactly what it is that she is doing wrong. The
only message conveyed is that the student is bad and needs to stop
14_980668 ch10.qxp 7/27/06 3:27 PM Page 182
being bad as soon as possible. But why she or he is bad, what it is
that must be stopped, and how the student can change for the bet-
ter, are never revealed. Note also that the first evaluation is given
two weeks
after the events described, by which time the learner’s
memory of the class will probably be dim.
By way of contrast, the second evaluation is given very soon
after the events, which heightens its significance for the learner.
The evaluation specifies which particular actions the teacher finds
objectionable. It then suggests in clear and concrete terms what the
student might do to improve the situation. Instead of only being
condemned for bad behavior, the learner
is told why it is in his own
best interests to consider changing. The teacher also acknowledges
the student’s experience and enthusiasm, a fact that should help
him feel respected while being criticized. The student also has the
possibility of reacting to the evaluation after the next three weeks
of classes and can contact the teacher for further clarification and
discussion. The student does not have to bottle up feelings of
shame, anger, or embarrassment but
can talk through these with
their instigator.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: