The Ministry of Higher and secondary education of the Republic of Uzbekistan The Uzbekistan state World Languages University

Part of the lesson	Tasks
Time
1	Organizational Moment	-to greet pupils. - to check up the register	5 min
2	Repeating last lesson	- to give pupils some questions about last lesson. – to ask words from previous lesson	5 min
3	Explaining new theme	- to explain to pupils new vocabulary and theme	20 min
4	Consolidating new theme.	- to consolidate new theme and new words of the theme.	10 min
5	Marking.	- To mark pupils	5 min
6	Homework.	- Giving homework.

PROCEDURE OF THE LESSON:
I. Organizational part:
- greeting
- checking up the register
- checking up the homework Translate a telegram


II. Pre-activity
Activity 3a Read and find the words and expressions in the Wordlist and write the translation.
Objective: to oractise usina the Wordlist When PP know what the words mean, say the words and ask them to repeat after you in chorus, in rows and individually.

Vocabulary:

cash a postal order - pochta tartibida naqt olmoq by air mail - havo yo’li orqali an express telegram - ekspres telegramma per kilo - bir kilo uchun a registered letter - buyurtma xat sign/signature - imzolamoq/imzo

III. Main Part
Activity 3b Listen to the four conversations in the post office and say what the customer does in each one.


IV. Post-activity
Activity 4 Work in pairs. Take turns to be a customer and clerk in the post office.
Objective: to give further practice (through role play) of the language needed in a post office
PP work in pairs. PI is the post office clerk and P2 is the customer. role play the 4 situations. Walk around the class listenmg and prompting where necessary but try not to interrupt. When they have completed the four role plays, ask them to change roles and repeat.





V. Homework
Do the homework page 43
VI. Evaluation. giving marks
CONCLUSION
For conclusion, I want to argue that it will be worth to teach and assesses grammar by interesting interactive grammar activities, which are designed for pre-grammar, while-grammar and post-grammar stages. In pre-grammar stage, we can use declarative approach to explain all features of certain grammar function with helping interactive methods. In while-grammar stage, we can gain and fix of new grammatical combination and in post-grammar stage, students are led to follow grammar accuracy in speaking with using some interactive methods.
First things first, let’s discuss the importance of teaching grammar before we look at the methods that bring out the desired results. Why Is It Important To Teach Grammar Correctly? The gains from improved grammatical competence are plenty. The impact on teaching and learning includes improved reading and writing skills, listening, and speaking. But these gains extend to the students’ post-graduate life as students who have attained a high degree of grammatical competence tend to exhibit communicative proficiency.
In the classroom, grammar might just seem like a boring lesson. But once the learner leaves the campus, it is more than an ordinary lesson. It gives them a better chance of getting a job and study opportunities.
Very efficient methods of teaching grammar involve incorporating interactivity into lessons. By utilizing games to teach grammar, the teacher engages students and the process helps the learners to retain a lot of the content that they’ve learned. 
References
• ETpedia Grammar by Daniel Barber and Ceri Jones is out now.

• 
  Ellis, R. (2002), Grammar teaching – Practice or consciousness-raising? In Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (eds), Methodology in Language Teaching – An anthology of current practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  
• 
  Harmer, J. (2007), The practice of English language teaching, Harlow: Pearson Longman, 4^th Edition
  
• 
  Scrivener, J. (2011), Learning Teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching, Macmillan, 3^rd edition
  
• 
  Thornbury, S. (2013), How to teach grammar, Harlow: Pearson
  
• 
  Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., Robinson, A., Zhu, D. (2004a) The effect of grammar teaching (sentence combining) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
  
• 
  Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Locke, T., Low, G., Robinson, A., Zhu, D. (2004b) The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
  
• 
  Brenchley &Cushing, 2018, Take a "simple" approach to teaching grammar.
  
• 
  Burrows, P 2014, A Creative Approach to Teaching Grammar.
  
• 
  Lines, H (2014) Secondary school English teachers’ and students’ conceptualisations of quality in writing.
  
• 
  Reedy & Bearne, 2013 Teaching Grammar Effectively in Primary Schools.
  
• 
  Safford, Messer, Mclachlan and Walker (2015) Teaching grammar and testing grammar in the English primary school: the impact on teachers and teaching of the grammar element of the statutory test in Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG) in England.
  
• 
  Myhill, D. and Fisher, R. (2010) Editorial: Writing development: cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives. Journal of Research in Reading. Volume 33, Issue 1, 2010. Myhill, D., Lines, H. and
  
• 
  Ofsted, 2019 The Education Inspection Framework. Manchester. Crown Copyright.
  
• 
  Watson, A. (2011) Making meaning with grammar: a repertoire of possibilities. University of Exeter. Metaphor, Issue 2, 2011.