research
*
eu No. 63 | APRIL 2010
37
escalating responses to crime and to what are
seen as threats to public and social order.” This
includes a fear of young people. Nevertheless,
according to various British studies, only a very
small proportion of rising crime is committed
by minors.
Gilded ghettos
Taken together, all of these fears and the
responses to them increase social exclusion and
reorganise the urban space. ‘Ghettoisation’
does not happen only in the poorest districts.
Gated communities (secure housing with
guards, surrounded by fences or walls) have
been springing up the world over since the
1960s. In Europe, they are concentrated mainly
in the United Kingdom, France and Portugal, as
well as in some former Communist countries.
Although this form of self-protection pro-
vides a measure of prevention, it is certainly
not the best option. Some European countries
have implemented more concrete attempts
at prevention in recent years, experimenting
with collaboration between the public and
private sectors, associations, non-governmental
organisations and local police. The idea has
rarely achieved the desired effect though, as
social workers do not wish to be turned into
informers. Adam Crawford (Leeds University,
UK), a Crimprev partner, admits that these
initiatives show that the levers and causes of
crime are beyond the traditional scope of the
criminal justice system, adding that over the
years successful preventive partnerships have
proven obstinately illusory.
How about abolition?
Prison sentences therefore continue to be
used extensively, even though substitute solu-
tions have been implemented for several years.
They include electronic surveillance (a bracelet
fitted with a chip to track an individual’s
movements), used mainly in northern Europe;
community service instead of short sentences
(work with an association, hospital or environ-
mental service, for example); and open-prison
regimes where a detainee works outside the
prison during the day and returns in the evening.
Joe Sim says: “The societal problem of pris-
ons could be solved by what Angela Davis terms
‘abolitionist alternatives’. I believe that these
alternatives could include a halt to prison build-
ing, a reduction in the budgets allocated to
punishing crime in favour of prevention, the
creation of more humane regimes for people
in prison, taking into account the damage caused
by those in power, and an end to the social
divide. Contrary to popular and political belief,
the abolitionists are not calling for the walls to
be torn down. They are seeking a less hypo-
critical approach to crime and criminality and the
implementation of radical policies that offer
genuine public protection to all European
citizens, whatever their social status.”
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: