The holy faith of reformed samaritanism

The problem with raising a man [i.e., Jesus] to the level of God, is that you end up lowering God to the 
level of man! 
The Christian writings say: «What I am saying is this: One of you says, “I belong to Paul,” or “I belong to 
Apollos,” or “I belong to Cephas,” or “I belong to Christ”»- 1 Corinthians 1:12 (1599 Geneva Bible). 
In their well intended [but totally misguided] attempt to praise Jesus, Christianity has raised him to the level 
of God. But this is foolish, as the gospel quotes the former stating that he has no interest in the praise of men 
(“I receive not the praise of men”- John 5:41, 1599 Geneva Bible). 
Not only that but, by raising Jesus to the level of God, Christianity ends up lowering God to the level of men-
348

---

thereby placing the morally perfect Creator in the same list as their morally flawed creatures; men like like 
Paul, Apollos, and Cephas. 
There’s more! Not only is God placed in the same list with morally flawed human beings, but He is even 
placed at the end of the list! (“I belong to Paul… I belong to Apollos… I belong to Cephas…. I belong to 
Jesus”). 
¿Could you imagine ancient Hebrew believers splitting themselves into “followers of Abraham”, “followers 
of Moses”, “followers of David”, and finally “Followers of the Lord”? Wouldn’t it be a sort of pagan 
blasphemy to even suggest that the Creator was just another flawed mortal human being, just as Abraham, 
Moses, and David? 
Did Jesus [peace and blessings be upon him] perfectly fulfill the 613 commandments comprising God's 
Law? 
Christianity is a noble and godly religion. But, though well intended, Christian theology is misleading, and 
incoherent. Consider the following example: Christianity claims Jesus to be sinless, and therefore suitable to 
be the atoning sacrifice commanded at Passover [and Yom Kippur] by Moses Law. 
But, did Jesus literally fulfill the 613 commandments comprising Moses Law? In fact, given that Christianity
claims him to be the perfect [and supreme] Jewish high priest, we may also ask ourselves: Did Jesus actually 
follow what the Law had to say concerning atoning sacrifices... Did he perfectly obey all that was 
commanded to the Aaronic priests? And even more importantly-- did he sacrifice himself according to what 
was commanded by Moses Law? 
Sadly, the answer to the former questions is a resounding, “No!”. Actually, how could he had done so, when 
his priesthood had in fact nothing to do with the Aaronic order prescribed [and regulated] by Moses Law, but 
rather with the [pagan] order of Melchizedek [for which the Law had nothing to command]? 
And from whence do we know Jesus didn't follow the Aaronic priesthood prescribed by God's Law? We 
know it from the verse that goes on to say: 
“Although he [Jesus] was the Son, he learned obedience from what he suffered... and he was declared by God
a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek... Jesus has entered there on our behalf as a forerunner, 
because he has become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek... Now if perfection came
through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was 
there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the 
349

---

order of Aaron?... Now it is evident that our Lord [Jesus] came from Judah, and Moses said nothing about 
that tribe concerning priests. And this becomes clearer if another priest like Melchizedek appears, who did 
not become a priest based on a legal regulation about physical descent... For it has been testified: You are a 
priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek”- Hebrews 5:8-10, 6:20, 7:11, 7:14-16, 7:17, Christian 
Standard Bible. 
Thus, it is self evident that Jesus sinned, by failing to obey the Law; In other words, by not offering his own 
sacrifice according to what the Law had clearly commanded Aaron (sacrifices to be made only inside the 
holy Temple, and only by the hand of Aaron's offspring), but rather according to the obscure and uncertain 
dictum of a pagan order [which apparently allowed sacrifices to be made on top of open hills, and by the 
hand of idol worshiping Heathens].