THE DANGER OF PROPAGANDA
The following material is particularly important because propaganda
fomented the Spanish-American War and both World Wars. Ford (1922,
p. 203) was actually somewhat ahead of Linebarger’s (1954) Psychological
Warfare in the identification of honest and dishonest uses of propaganda:
There has been too much of this kind of psychological crime committed
in the world these past few years—the crime of bringing men to act from
the highest and sincerest motives of self-sacrifice, and then using that high
spirit for the lowest purposes.
216 • The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work
Ford was doubtlessly familiar with the role of the “yellow press,” the
competing newspapers of William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer,
in fomenting the Spanish-American War. There was and is no evidence
that Spain sabotaged the battleship Maine, but the yellow press proclaimed
immediately that Spain had murdered American sailors with a perfidious
attack. Judge Magazine (July 9, 1898) had on its cover Grant Hamilton’s
“The Spanish Brute: Adds Mutilation to Murder.” This may well have been
the first widely circulated cartoon that depicted the enemy as a subhuman
monster; in this case, a fanged ape in a Spanish uniform with blood drip-
ping from his knife.
Ford’s statement, “Make the nation suspicious; make the other nation
suspicious,” applied to Spanish newspapers almost as much as to the yel-
low press. One Spanish cartoon portrayed the United States as a pig, and
the implication was clearly that the Spanish people were spoiling for a
fight. An intelligent Spanish propagandist would have instead attempted
to derail a war by portraying Hearst and Pulitzer as using the blood of
Spanish and American soldiers as ink for their newspapers.
Propagandists of World War I transformed Grant Hamilton’s creation
into a fanged ape in a spiked helmet, with a terrified woman in one paw
and a bloody club labeled kultur (German for “culture”) in the other. The
cartoonist W. A. Rogers meanwhile created images of dead American
children after the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915. The sensationalistic
portrayal of Germany as the murderer of American civilians overcame all
inquiries as to whether Germany had a legal right to sink the Lusitania,
which it did. Greenhill (2008) reported that a diving team found 4 million
rounds of 0.303 caliber rifle ammunition, that of Britain’s Short Magazine
Lee-Enfield Rifle, on the sunken wreck. This kind of propaganda, and
Germany’s failure to respond effectively, drew the United States into a
war in which more than 100,000 American soldiers died and more than
200,000 were wounded.
The German who learned the most from Germany’s propaganda fail-
ures and the Triple Entente’s (Great Britain, France, and Russia) success
was unfortunately Adolf Hitler. His successful application of the lessons
in question then enabled him to take over Germany and perpetrate World
War II.
If this is not enough reason for citizens and national leaders to beware
of dishonest propaganda, it is necessary to add that Ford himself fell victim
to it despite his explicit knowledge of its dangers. His publication of the
infamous International Jew was the direct result of his interaction with the
Things in General • 217
Czarist propagandist Boris Brasol, who presented him with a copy of the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The copy was sufficiently authoritative that
Ford believed its contents to be accurate. Sinclair (1937, p. 55) cites Ford’s
meeting with Brasol, as does the Jewish Virtual Library.
*
The result was
the promotion of anti-Semitism along with enormous damage to Ford’s
reputation. This, along with the role of propaganda in drawing the United
States into at least two conflicts (Spanish-American War and World War I)
in which it had no business, reinforces the need for every citizen to educate
himself or herself on the subject of propaganda and psychological warfare.
Ford’s description of a “group of men with vast powers of control”
applies to what President Eisenhower would later call the military-indus-
trial complex. Eisenhower’s observation meanwhile echoes that of Niccolò
Machiavelli (1965, pp. 17–21), who warned that no country should allow
anybody to make war his only profession. A company that can make only
military products is in roughly the same position, and it requires either a
war or the threat of one to prosper. It also is quite possible that Ford knew
the reputation of Basil Zaharoff, the arms trader known as the Merchant
of Death.
The needs of twenty-first century armies admittedly require special-
ized defense contractors, but it is in these companies’ interest to be able to
make peacetime products to avoid dependence on government contracts.
Ford’s industries were obviously capable of doing this.
* * *
An impartial investigation of the last war, of what preceded it and what has
come out of it, would show beyond a doubt that there is in the world a group
of men with vast powers of control, that prefers to remain unknown, that
does not seek office or any of the tokens of power, that belongs to no nation
whatever but is international—a force that uses every government, every
widespread business organization, every agency of publicity, every resource
of national psychology, to throw the world into a panic for the sake of get-
ting still more power over the world. An old gambling trick used to be for the
gambler to cry “Police!” when a lot of money was on the table, and, in the
panic that followed, to seize the money and run off with it. There is a power
within the world which cries “War!” and in the confusion of the nations, the
unrestrained sacrifice which people make for safety and peace runs off with
the spoils of the panic.
*
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/protocols1.html (accessed July 2
2012).
218 • The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work
The point to keep in mind is that, though we won the military contest, the
world has not yet quite succeeded in winning a complete victory over the pro-
moters of war. We ought not to forget that wars are a purely manufactured evil
and are made according to a definite technique. A campaign for war is made
upon as definite lines as a campaign for any other purpose. First, the people
are worked upon. By clever tales the people’s suspicions are aroused toward the
nation against whom war is desired. Make the nation suspicious; make the other
nation suspicious. All you need for this is a few agents with some cleverness and
no conscience and a press whose interest is locked up with the interests that will
be benefited by war. Then the “overt act” will soon appear. It is no trick at all to
get an “overt act” once you work the hatred of two nations up to the proper pitch.
There were men in every country who were glad to see the World War begin
and sorry to see it stop. Hundreds of American fortunes date from the Civil
War; thousands of new fortunes date from the World War. Nobody can deny
that war is a profitable business for those who like that kind of money. War
is an orgy of money, just as it is an orgy of blood.
And we should not so easily be led into war if we considered what it is that
makes a nation really great. It is not the amount of trade that makes a nation
great. The creation of private fortunes, like the creation of an autocracy, does
not make any country great. Nor does the mere change of an agricultural
population into a factory population. A country becomes great when, by the
wise development of its resources and the skill of its people, property is widely
and fairly distributed.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |