|
himself fully justified in ranking the races
of man as distinct species; for he has
found that they are distinguished by many
differences in structure and constitution,
some being of importance."
20. Darwin 1871, p. 225, Vol. 1 .
21. Darwin 1871, p. 225, Vol. 1 , quote: "… the
distinctive characters of every race of
man were highly variable. … It may be
doubted whether any character can be
named which is distinctive of a race and
is constant."
22. Darwin 1871, p. 226, Vol. 1
23. Radick 2013, p. 176
Ghiselin 2009, p. 35
24. Desmond & Moore 2009, pp. 374–375.
25. Desmond & Moore 2009, p. 375.
2 . Darwin 1871, pp. 228–232, Vol. 1 .
27. Desmond & Moore 2009, p. 376.
2 . Darwin 1871, p. 236, Vol. 1 .
29. Bowler 1996, pp. 189–190.
30. Stamos 2008, p. 134
Ghiselin 2009, p. 35
Darwin 1871, pp. 248–250, Vol. 1 , quote:
"We have thus far been baffled in all our
attempts to account for the differences
between the races of man; but there
remains one important agency, namely
Sexual Selection, which appears to have
acted as powerfully on man, as on many
other animals."
31. Coyne, Jerry (January 2009), Why
Evolution Is True , ISBN 978-0-670-
02053-9
32. Bowler & Morus 2005, p. 503
33. Vandermassen, Griet (2004), "Sexual
Selection: A Tale of Male Bias and
Feminist Denial", European Journal of
Women's Studies, 11 (9): 9–26,
CiteSeerX 10.1.1.550.3672 ,
doi:10.1177/1350506804039812 ,
S2CID 145221350
34. Blackwell 1976, p. 22
35. Blackwell 1976, p. 234
3 . Blackwell 1976, pp. 117–118
37. Darwin, Descent of Man 2: pp. 327–328
3 . Hubbard, Ruth (1990), The Politics of
Women's Biology , Rutgers State
University, p. 93, ISBN 978-0-8135-1490-1
39. Ah-King, Malin (2007), "Sexual Selection
Revisited, Towards a Gender-Neutral
Theory and Practice: A Response to
Vandermassen's 'Sexual Selection: A Tale
of Male Bias and Feminist Denial' " ,
European Journal of Women's Studies, 14
(341): 341–348,
doi:10.1177/1350506807081883 ,
S2CID 51915932
40. Fedigan 1992, p. 273
41. Letter 2743 – Darwin, C. R. to Gray, Asa, 3
April (1860) , Darwin Correspondence
Project
42. Jabr, Ferris (9 January 2019). "How
Beauty Is Making Scientists Rethink
Evolution – The extravagant splendor of
the animal kingdom can't be explained by
natural selection alone – so how did it
come to be?" . The New York Times.
Retrieved 10 January 2019.
43. George Campbell, Duke of Argyll (1867),
"The Reign of Law" , Nature, 3 (67): 289,
Bibcode:1871Natur...3..289T ,
doi:10.1038/003289c0 ,
S2CID 4088542 , chapter 5: "Creation".
44. "Slavery Abolition Act 1833; Section XII" .
28 August 1833. Retrieved 30 October
2018.
45. Webster, Richard (2005), Why Freud Was
Wrong: Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis,
Oxford: The Orwell Press, pp. ii–iii,
ISBN 978-0-9515922-5-0
4 . Roughgarden, Joan (2004). Evolution's
Rainbow: Diversity, Gender and Sexuality
in Nature and People. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
47. Joseph Jordania, Why do People Sing?
Music in Human Evolution. Logos,
2011:186–196.
4 . Takahashi M et al. (2008). Anim . Behav.,
75: 1209–1219.
49. Loyau A et al. (2008). Anim. Behav., 76;
e5–e9.
Sources
50. Joseph Jordania (2011). "Peacock's Tail:
Tale of Beauty and Intimidation". Why do
People Sing? Music in Human Evolution.
Logos. pp. 192–196.
51. "Darwin Online" .
Blackwell, Antoinette (1992) [1875]. The
Sexes Throughout Nature. Hyperion Press [
G. P. Putnam's Sons ]. ISBN 978-0-88355-
349-7. – (archive.org ) first re-issued by
Hyperion in 1976
Bowler, Peter J. (1996). Charles Darwin : the
man and his influence. Cambridge England,
New York NY, USA: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 978-0-521-56668-1.
Bowler, Peter J.; Morus, Iwan Rhys (2005).
Making Modern Science. The University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-06861-9.
Brooks, Ross (2021). "Darwin's Closet: The
Queer Sides of The Descent of Man
(1871)" . Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society. 191: 323–346.
Cronin, Helena (1993). The ant and the
peacock: altruism and sexual selection from
Darwin to today. Press Syndicate of the
University of Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-521-
45765-1. – somewhat ahistorical treatment
of the Darwin–Wallace debate on sexual
selection.
Darwin, Charles (1871). The Descent of Man,
and Selection in Relation to Sex . 1 (1st ed.).
London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0-8014-
2085-6. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
Darwin, Charles (1871b). The Descent of
Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2
(1st ed.). London: John Murray.
Fedigan, Linda Marie (1992). "Sexual
selection: female choice or Hobson's
choice?". Primate paradigms. University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-23948-4.
Freeman, R. B. (1977), The Works of Charles
Darwin: An Annotated Bibliographical
Handlist , Folkestone: Wm Dawson & Sons
Ltd, ISBN 978-0-208-01658-4, retrieved
8 September 2008
Ghiselin, Michael T. (2009), Darwin: A
Reader's Guide , Occasional Papers of the
California Academy of Sciences, retrieved
18 April 2016
Jackson, John P. Jr.; Weidman, Nadine M.
(2004). Race, Racism, and Science: Social
Impact and Interaction.
Moore, James; Desmond, Adrian (2004).
"Introduction". The Descent of Man, and
Selection in Relation to Sex (2nd ed.).
London: Penguin Classics. ISBN 978-0-14-
043631-0.
Paul, Diane B. (2003). "Darwin, Social
Darwinism and Eugenics". In Hodge,
Jonathan; Radick, Gregory (eds.). The
Cambridge Companion to Darwin .
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
pp. 214 –239.
Radick, Gregory (2013). "Darwin and
Humans". In Ruse, Michael (ed.). The
Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and
Evolutionary Thought.
Stamos, David N. (2008). Evolution and the
Big Questions: Sex, Race, Religion, and Other
Matters .
Wikisource
has original text related
to this article:
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
