An animal is incapable of understanding that the sun is one and the same, whether
today or yesterday -
EXACTLY AS WE PROBABLY CANNOT
UNDERSTAND THAT THE MORNING IS ONE, AND THE SPRING IS ONE.
The motion of objects which, for us,
is not illusory but real, such as the motion of a
rotating wheel or a moving carriage and so on, must, for an animal, differ greatly from
the motion it sees in all objects which are motionless for us - that motion in the guise
of which it sees the third dimension of bodies. This first motion (i.e. motion which is
also real for us) must appear to it spontaneous,
alive.
And these two kinds of motion will be incommensurable for it.
An animal will be able to measure an angle or a convex surface, although it will not
understand its true meaning and will regard it as motion. But it will never be able to
measure real motion, i.e. motion which is real for us. To do this it is necessary to have
our conception of time
and measure all movements in relation to some more constant
motion, i.e. compare all movements with one. As an animal has no concepts, it will not
be able to do this. Therefore, movements of objects which are
real for us
will be
incapable of measurement, and thus
incommensurable with
other movements which,
for it, are real and
capable of measurement, but for us are illusory, constituting in
reality the third dimension of bodies.
The latter is inevitable. If an animal senses and measures
as motion
that which is not
motion, it is clear that it cannot apply the same measure to that which is and that which
is not motion.
But this does not mean that an animal cannot know the character of movements
proceeding in our world and conform to them.
On the contrary, we see that an animal
orientates perfectly among the movements of objects of our three-dimensional world.
In this it is helped by instinct, i.e. capacity, evolved through hundreds of centuries of
selection, of performing expedient actions without consciousness of purpose. And an
animal discriminates perfectly well between movements happening round it.
But, distinguishing between two kinds of phenomena -
two kinds of motion -
an
animal is bound to explain one of them by some inner inexplicable property of objects,
i.e. it will probably regard that kind of motion as the result of the
animation of
objects,
and
will regard moving objects
as alive.
A kitten plays with a ball or with its own tail because the ball or the tail
runs away
from it.
A bear will fight with a beam until the beam throws him off the tree, because in the
swinging beam he feels something alive and hostile.
A horse shies from a bush because the bush has suddenly turned round and
waved a branch.
In the latter case the bush may not have moved at all - it was the horse that
was running. But it
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: