Recommendation 3
(continued)
When providing feedback, use the student’s
strength in one area to build on the area of
need. For example, if a student uses transitions
well in informational writing but does not use
them at all in argumentative writing, highlight
the transitions used in the student’s informa-
tional writing piece and show where transitions
are needed in his or her argumentative writing
piece. By providing specific examples, teachers
can help students leverage their strengths in
one area to improve their skills in another.
Have students provide feedback to their
peers, benefiting both the students provid-
ing the feedback and the students receiving
it. Students may be able to identify problems
in peers’ writing more easily than they can
in their own. Additionally, when students
provide written feedback and assessment to
peers, their comments and observations may
enhance their understanding of their own
writing. Have students work together in pairs
to brainstorm ways to improve their writing
assignments based on feedback received from
the teacher. (See Recommendation 1b for more
opportunities for students to reflect upon their
own work and their peers’.)
Finally, have students maintain portfolios with
examples of their work throughout the year,
and evaluate the portfolios periodically to
identify trends and continuing needs. In addi-
tion to teacher review, students should review
their own portfolios to see their growth. Port-
folios provide a more complete view of stu-
dents’ instructional needs, as they can express
skills differently in different forms of writing.
Their portfolios may include writing samples
across disciplines, especially when teams of
teachers are working together.
3. Regularly monitor students’ progress while teaching writing strategies and skills.
Monitor students’ progress at regular inter-
vals to accurately track progress and adapt
instruction as necessary. Collect multiple
data points across different writing skills and
forms of writing to build a complete picture
of student progress. The frequency of moni-
toring will depend on students’ progress and
the learning goals, and requires balancing
the need for information with the burden on
teachers and students. For broader, compre-
hensive goals, such as improving students’
use of voice or the overall persuasiveness of
their arguments, checking student progress
at the beginning, middle, and end of the
semester enables mid-semester adjustment
and provides enough time for instruction to
impact learning. For intermediate or simpler
goals, such as richness of detail for a specific
piece of text or clarity of an idea in text,
administering daily exit slips enables teach-
ers to adjust each lesson and efficiently verify
that students adequately master a skill before
the next skill is introduced.
If the data collected reveal that students’
skills vary for a particular goal, create small
groups of students who have the same needs
and regularly monitor their progress. Small
groups should be organized on a particular
topic or need and remain relatively fluid so
students work together on common skills
or processes with one group of students
and move on to other groups as their needs
change. If students in a group do not provide
effective feedback to improve each other’s
drafts, consider adjusting the composition
of the groups to include at least one student
with strong editing skills.
Use tracking tools, such as the tracking sheet
in Example 3.6, to provide a visual representa-
tion of student growth and areas for improve-
ment. Tracking student progress digitally
enables teachers to easily manipulate the data
and share it with students and parents.
(
54
)
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |