Figure 12. General errors in a FEA approach, singularity check and sample singularity calculation from the FEA
results of the Para-Plow
Figure 13. Output results of the FEA: Equivalent stress distribution, safety factor distribution and deformation
distribution
Figure 14. Validation study: Comparison of the experimental and the FEA stress results at SG locations
558
559
560
Table Captions
Table 1. Draft force and equivalent (von Mises) stress values extracted from field tests
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
Figure 1. Strength-based design analysis application algorithm for an appropriate agricultural machinery
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
Figure 2. Key aspects of the technical and dimensional specifications of the Para-Plow tool
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607 Figure 3. Soil properties of the test field and testing scenario scheme
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627 Figure 4. Components of the draft force measurement system and its tractor attachment
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
Figure 5. Components of the Strain-Gauge (SG) measurement system and SG locations on the Para-Plow
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
Figure 6. Schematic demonstration of the computer aided data acquisition systems and the pictures taken during
field tests of nominal (tillage dept: 400 mm) and worst-case (tillage dept: 500 mm) tillage operations
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
Figure 7. Field Test Results-01: Draft force and experimental stress values of nominal tillage condition
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
Figure 8. Field Test Results-02: Draft force and experimental stress values of worst-case tillage condition
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
Figure 9. Some statistical details and visuals from the Para-Plow CAD modelling procedures
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
Figure10. Material testing results and determination of failure criteria (material yield point)
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
Figure 11. Boundary conditions assumed in the FEA, details and verification (Skewness check) of the FE model
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788 Figure 12. General errors in a FEA approach, singularity check and sample singularity calculation from the FEA
789 results of the Para-Plow
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815 Figure 13. Output results of the FEA: Equivalent stress distribution, safety factor distribution and deformation
816 distribution
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
Figure 14. Validation study: Comparison of the experimental and the FEA stress results at SG locations
841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
Draft force and equivalent (von Mises) stress values extracted from field tests
|
|
|
|
Table 1.
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tillage
|
Tractor
|
Tractor
|
Draft Force
|
|
|
Equivalent (Von Mises) Stress at SG Locations*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wheel
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
Speed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field Test Conditions
|
Depth
|
Skidding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Average)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Average)
|
(Resultant Force)
|
SG-01
|
SG-02
|
SG-03
|
SG-04
|
SG-05
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max.
|
Average
|
Max.
|
Average
|
Max.
|
Average
|
Max.
|
Average
|
Max.
|
Average
|
Max.
|
Average
|
|
|
|
( mm )
|
( km h-1 )
|
( % )
|
( N )
|
( N )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
( MPa )
|
846
|
|
Stage #1:
|
400
|
5.0
|
12
|
42181
|
19772
|
5.91
|
2.65
|
23.05
|
8.65
|
12.35
|
5.16
|
12.74
|
3.03
|
40.43
|
19.84
|
|
Nominal Tillage Condition**
|
847
|
|
Stage #2:
|
500
|
1.2
|
40
|
51716
|
33514
|
8.28
|
4.00
|
25.82
|
15.49
|
10.44
|
3.86
|
27.37
|
8.73
|
44.36
|
28.63
|
|
Worst-Case Tillage Condition
|
848
849
850
851
Operated tillage area: 675( m 2 ) )
31
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |