15
receiving of
information, and the social system is a formation of interlaced units that
achieve a common goal (Rogers, 2003). Rogers posited that the measurement of time in
diffusion research which includes: innovation decision, innovativeness of an individual or
unit, and rate of adoption, was a strength in the DOI theory.
Diffusion of innovations theory has beginnings in sociology and agriculture and
has since been applied to other disciplines
such as medical sociology, marketing, health
promotion, development studies, and communications (Valente & Rogers, 1995). Early
diffusion research appeared in studies of rural sociology,
communications, marketing,
and medical sociology; however, researchers of each discipline applied DOI differently
(Greenhalgh, Robert, Macfarlane, Bate, & Kyriakidou, 2004
)
. Katz, Levine, and
Hamilton (1963) compared the similarities of diffusion between medical sociology, rural
sociology, and anthropology. The concept of innovation in rural
sociology seen in Ryan
and Gross’s 1943 hybrid seed corn experiment formed the foundation of DOI research
and detailed how farmers accepted an innovation after influence from earlier adopters
(Greenhalgh et al., 2004; Valente & Rogers, 1995). Rogers and Kincaid (1981)
conceptualized DOI in communications studies as new information transmitted by mass
media or through personal relationships. Coleman, Katz, and Menzel (1966) applied DOI
to doctor’s acceptance and prescription of antibiotics; the study was the catalyst for
network analysis (Burt, 1973). In marketing, innovations were either
products or services
and researchers used perceived benefits or costs to measure success and adoption
behavior (Greenhalgh et al., 2004).
16
Diffusion of innovations was one of the most commonly examined theories to
explain a specific population’s adoption of an innovation and the acceptance of new
technologies within society (Rogers, 2003). Some businesses strived to gain competitive
advantage through innovations and by being unique (Brem, Maier, & Wimschneider,
2016). Zolkepli and Kamarulzaman (2015) referred to characteristics of the DOI theory
on social media adoption and discovered information that could help marketers
understand factors that inspire social media usage.
I applied the DOI theory to
understand the innovative practice of SMM strategies small business retailers used to
engage customers.
I considered using Porter’s competitive strategy theory as the conceptual
framework. Porter discovered strategy theory in 1980 (Porter, 1980). Competitive
strategy is the most researched theory in business strategy literature (Block, Kohn, Miller,
& Ullrich, 2015). Porter’s framework includes three competitive strategies: (a) cost
leadership, (b) differentiation, and (c) cost focus (Farrell, 2015). The difference between
the DOI theory and Porter’s competitive strategy is that the DOI theory explains a
population’s adoption of an innovation and the acceptance of
new technologies within
society (Rogers, 2003), whereas the main premise of Porter’s competitive strategy theory
is that business leaders can create more value and sales than competitors (Menon & Yao,
2017). I could use Porter’s competitive strategy theory to explore business sustainability
practices and competitive advantage; however, Porter’s theory would not fully explain
the innovation adoption process.