Official policies for SME development can be evaluated against their impact upon enterprise culture,
start-up, survival and growth of SMEs, and stakeholder empathy. Each of these criteria feeds off the others.
Enterprise culture will be strong where there are high rates of SME growth. Where SMEs are dominant
features in the local and regional economic and social environment, stakeholders themselves will be
influenced and will adjust their behaviour accordingly.
This template of culture and business and stakeholder development may be used in very different
country contexts. Each country has different problems and opportunities and therefore
priorities for change
and resource availability will vary. These factors will dictate not only how many areas covered in this guide
can be targeted, but also the scale on which any programme of change can be pursued.
Targets also move dramatically over time. SME development policies in Western Europe, for example,
focused on employment creation in the late 1980s and early 1990s. By the end of the century the emphasis
had changed to international competitiveness and innovation. As a result, policy targets moved towards
technology issues and creation of an enterprise culture. In transition economies
a major focus has been upon
creating an enabling environment for the market economy. Hence much of SME policy has targeted the
building of an appropriate regulatory environment, privatisation and restructuring, development of the
financial sector and mechanisms for private and public SME support.
In addition to SME policies, many countries have adopted small business legislative acts, including
such countries with economies
in transition as Russia, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria.
Within the national framework, acts may specifically target the local level, as in the case of the German
Länder. Their content varies but usually includes a declaration of support for small businesses, a definition
for public policy purposes and principles on which support for the sector will be based. In addition they
may contain institutional support arrangements, types of support to be given and methods of reporting.
The absence of an act does not mean that there is no policy. Countries like
France and the UK prefer
flexibility in their approach. One problem with acts is that they may need constant amendment as policy
develops.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: