Conclusion
The main conclusions indicated that the media market in Kazakhstan was unevenly
financed. The governmental public information orders primarily supported the financial
well-being and probably the quality of their product. In contrast, private media struggled
financially. They were put in uneven position even in their efforts to attract business's
advertising budgets because they competed against the same financially well-off public
media. Some of the articles raised the issue that those governmental public information
orders might be used as leverages to influence the media tone and content. State
propaganda is the most acute problem, as a result of which low-quality journalists appear.
Unfortunately, underfunded media produces a low quality of content, which
affects journalistic education. Yesterday's students are very often completely illiterate,
which means their grammar skills are pretty low, have no idea how to work. Employers
lose a considerable amount of time on training graduates of journalism schools, as well
SCIENCE AND PRACTICE: IMPLEMENTATION TO MODERN SOCIETY
959
as on editing or rewriting their materials. The journalism education system in
Kazakhstan needs radical reform. The main reason is the lack of education and training.
Some media outlets consciously refuse graduates of journalism departments since the
quality of their education leaves much to be desired. The Kazakhstani journalistic
community needs improvement of the mass media financial stability, as well as
professional training and retraining of personnel.
References:
1. Brown, M., & Ibrayeva, G. (2019). Why Study Journalism: Motivation of Future Kazakh
Journalists. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019, 5(1), 35-45.
2. Gizdatov, G. (2015). Journalism education in Kazakhstan: "around" and "about", 2015. Retrieved
March, 11 from http://mic.org.ru/phocadownload/12-gizdatov.pdf
3. Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.
4. Kaleeva, T. (2013). Prepyatstviya adn riski v razvitii plyoralizma SMI v respublike Kazahstan
[Challenges and Risks in the Development of pluralism of the Media in the Republic of Kazakhstan],
2013, pp. 66-71. In: UNESCO (2013). Towards free press in Central Asia: 20 Years After.
5. Legal Media Center (2019). State financing of the media in Kazakhstan, 2019. Retrieved
February, 18 from http://lmc.kz/ru/iframe/baza-poluchateley-gos-zakaza
6. Legislation database of CIS Countries (2020). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Mass Media,
(n/a). Retrieved 15 August 2020 from https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=1284.
7. Mambetova, I. (2016). Actual problems of the press of Kazakhstan. Retrieved February, 25 from
http://www.docme.ru/doc/1397184/aktual._nye-problemy-pressy-kazahstana--gg-
8. Media Sustainability Index (2012). The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in
Europe and Eurasia. IREX, Washington.
9. Media Sustainability Index (2019). The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in
Europe and Eurasia. IREX, Washington
10. Petyaksheva, N. (2019). What does the media community of Kazakhstan need? Study Summary.
Retrieved
9
December
2019
from
https://ru.internews.kz/2019/10/chto-nuzhno-
mediasoobshhestvu-rk-itogi-issledovaniya/
11. Yergaliyeva, A. (2018). Weeding out fake news is important, say OSCE Central Asia Media
Conference participants. Retrieved from https://astanatimes.com/2018/11/weeding-out-fake-
news-is-important-say-osce-central-asia-media-conference-participants/
SCIENTIFIC COLLECTION «INTERCONF» | № 3(39)
960
UDC 81'276: 070:004.77
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |