Enforceable right to payment for standard materials used as
inputs
IFRS 15.BC142
Contracts with customers to manufacture or construct goods with no
alternative use to the entity may require the use of standard raw materials or
components as inputs into the product being manufactured or constructed. In
many cases, these inputs (including work in progress) remain interchangeable
with other products until they are integrated into the customer’s product – i.e.
they have an alternative use. The entity will often not have an enforceable
right to payment for these standard inputs until they are integrated into the
customer’s product.
In these circumstances, the entity treats the raw materials or work in progress
as inventory until they are incorporated into the customer’s product. The fact
that the entity does not have an enforceable right to payment for standard
materials until they are integrated into the product being manufactured does not
result in the arrangement failing to meet Criterion 3. An entity’s right to payment
is assessed for performance completed. Standard materials are not considered
completed performance until they are integrated into the production process.
The assessment of an entity’s right to payment is for the standard materials
once they are integrated.
Termination of an over-time contract
IFRS 15.BC142
In some cases, an entity that has a contract meeting Criterion 3 for recognition
of revenue over time may choose not to enforce its right to payment. For
example, an entity may permit a customer to terminate a contract when no
termination right exists. In these cases, an entity needs to consider carefully
whether its right to payment remains enforceable such that Criterion 3 is met at
contract inception for similar contracts.
© 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
5 Step 5 – Recognise revenue when or as the entity satisfies a performance obligation | 127
5.2 Performance obligations satisfied over time
|
If an entity chooses to waive its enforceable right to payment, then a question
arises about how it should account for the termination – in particular, the
revenue that has been recognised over time under Criterion 3. It appears
that in these circumstances it is generally appropriate to reverse the revenue
previously recognised for which the right to payment has been waived.
For example, Developer D enters into a contract to sell an apartment to
Customer C for 100. The expected construction cost is 60. C is required to make
an up-front payment of 30, with the remaining 70 due on completion of the
apartment. C cannot terminate the contract and D has the right to complete the
apartment and require C to pay the promised consideration. D has determined
that this right is enforceable in its jurisdiction.
D determines that its contract with C meets Criterion 3 for the recognition
of revenue over time and that a cost-to-cost input measure of progress is
appropriate.
When the apartment is 80% complete, C approaches D with a request to
terminate the contract. Considering C’s circumstances, as an exception to
its customary business practice D agrees to terminate the contract, thereby
waiving its right to complete the apartment and enforce payment of 100 in cash
from C. D also agrees to refund the up-front payment of 30 to C.
At the time of the termination, D had recorded the following journal entries to
recognise revenue and costs over time as the apartment was constructed.
Debit
Credit
Contract asset
50
Cash
30
Revenue (100 × 80%)
80
To recognise revenue for construction of 80% of
apartment
1
Cost of sales
48
Cash/individual accounts related to construction
48
To recognise cost of sales for construction of
apartment performed to date
1
Note
1. For the purposes of this example, all journal entries recorded over time are
summarised and presented as one.
© 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
128 | Revenue – IFRS 15 handbook
We believe that it is generally appropriate for D to reverse the previously recognised
revenue and cost of sales. Therefore, D should record the following entries.
Debit
Credit
Revenue
80
Contract asset
50
Cash
30
Inventories – work in progress
48
Cost of sales
48
To reverse revenue and cost of sales on
termination of contract
D carefully considers whether its right to payment remains enforceable such
that Criterion 3 is met at contract inception for similar contracts.
Modifying the example, D agrees to terminate the contract with C but
retains the up-front payment of 30. In this case, we believe that it is generally
appropriate for D to reverse the previously recognised revenue for which it has
waived payment – i.e. 50 – and cost of sales. Therefore, D should record the
following entries.
Debit
Credit
Revenue
50
Contract asset
50
Inventories – work in progress
48
Cost of sales
48
To reverse revenue and cost of sales on
termination of contract
D carefully considers whether its right to payment remains enforceable such
that Criterion 3 is met at contract inception for similar contracts.
© 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
5 Step 5 – Recognise revenue when or as the entity satisfies a performance obligation | 129
5.2 Performance obligations satisfied over time
|
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |