|
Partisan language, immediacy, and attitude change. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 7, 477-489.
Ellis, N. C., & Hennelly, R. A. (1980). A bilingual word-length effect: Implications for
intelligence testing and the
relative ease of mental calculation in Welsh and English. British Journal of Psychology,
71, 43-51.Erickson, B., Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., & O'Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style
and impression
formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
Fairbanks, G., & Pronovost, W. (1939). An experimental study of the pitch characteristics of the
voiace during the expression of emotion. Speech Monographs, 6, 87-104.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fowler, C. A. (1988). Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various
communicative contexts. Language and Speech, 31, 307-319.
Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers signalling of "new" and "old" words in speech and
listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489-
505.
Fowler, C. A., & Levy, E. T. (1994). Talker-listener attunements to speech events. Unpublished
paper, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT:
Frick, R. W. (1985). Communicating emotion: The role of prosodic features. Psychological
Bulletin, 97, 412-429.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1991). Accuracy and bias in estimates of others' knowledge.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 445-454.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of
speakers' assumptions about others' knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 62, 378-391.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production
and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 25, 203-219.Gibbons, P., Busch, J., & Bradac, J. J. (1991). Powerful
versus powerless language: Consequences for persuasion, impression formation, and
cognitive response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 115-133.
Gibbs, R. W. J. (1991). A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to
understanding nonliteral discourse. Text, 2, 9-27.
Gibbs, R. W. J. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275-304.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication,
context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Context of
accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (1-68). Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., Henwood, K., Coupland, N., Harriman, J., & Coupland, J. (1992). Language attitudes
and cognitive mediation. Human Communication Research, 18, 500-527.
Giles, H., & Street, R. L. J. (1994). Communicator characteristics and behavior. In M. L. Knapp
& G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2 ed., pp. 103-161).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glucksberg, S., & Wiesberg, (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of
17
labeling in a functional fixedness problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 659-
664.
Gregory, S. W. Jr., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners
effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231-1240.
Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and Conversion’. In P. Cole .J. Morgan (Eds.) Studies in Syntax and
Semantics III: Speech Acts, New York: Academics Press, pp. 183-98.
Hamilton, M. A., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. (1990). An empirical test of an axiomatic model
of the relationship between language intensity and persuasion. Journal of Language and
Social Psychology, 9, 235-255.
Hardin, C., & Banaji, M. R. (1993). The influence of language on thought. Social Cognition, 11,
277-308.
Hardin, C., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective
objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and
cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford.
Hoosain, R. (1986). Language, orthography and cognitive processes: Chinese perspectives for
the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 507-525.
Hosman, L. A. (1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers:
Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383-406.
Hoosain, R., & Salili, F. (1987). Language differences in pronounication speed for numbers,
digit span, and mathematical ability. Psychologia, 30, 34-38.
Hu, Q. (1994). A study of some common features of mothers' vocabularies. In J. L. Sokolov &
C. E. Snow (Eds.), Handbook of research in language development using CHILDES.
Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hunnicut, S. (1985). Intelligibility versus redundancy--Conditions of dependency. Language and
Speech, 28(45-56),
Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective.
Psychological Review, 98, 377-389.
Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39,
341-350.
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1978). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist,
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
