4
Innocenti Digest No. 13
Promoting the Rights of
Children with Disabilities
The minimum benchmark was found particularly
helpful in comparing official country rates to this
standard since data, if available, are often not com-
parable between countries. Countries frequently
use different classifications, definitions and thresh-
olds between categories of ’disabled’ and ’non-dis-
abled’, with the result that a child who is classified
as, for example, having a mild impairment according
to one system might be regarded as not being disa-
bled at all under another.
Because of the high degree of stigma associated
with disability
in certain countries, parents and other
family members may be reluctant to report that
their child has a disability. Often these children have
not even had their birth registered, with the result
that they are not known to health, social services
or schools. In countries where literacy rates are low
and children frequently receive no formal schooling,
some learning disabilities (such as dyslexia) may
never be identified. In countries where diagnosis
is more advanced and the likelihood of survival
is greater or where state benefits are available to
support persons with disabilities,
there is a greater
incentive to register a child’s disability, thus contrib-
uting to a higher recorded prevalence of disability.
The issue of identification is also linked to age
group: it is not always easy to identify an impair-
ment in a very young child (a child under three years
old, for example), and many impairments only be-
come evident when a child starts attending school.
Some children – especially in developing countries
– will also acquire impairments through accidents
and illness, or in conditions of civil disturbance and
armed conflict.
With regard to data collection, consistent and ac-
curate information on children with disabilities
helps to make an ’invisible’ population ’visible’ by
demonstrating the extent and, indeed, the normality
of disability. For example, in Gambia, following the
publication of the National Disability Survey of 1998,
recognition of the rights of persons with disabilities
increased. The survey, administered to more than
30,000 households by a task force that included
persons with disabilities, was conducted to identify
the kinds of disabilities affecting children and their
geographical distribution. The aim was to facilitate
provision of services to children with disabilities.
5
Data on the types of impairment and the numbers
of children affected can inform service delivery
and improve the provision of the appropriate aids
and appliances. It also
enables the monitoring of
equality of opportunity and progress towards the
achievement of economic, social, political and
cultural rights. The most useful statistics are those
disaggregated by gender, age, ethnic origin and
urban/rural residence. It is important that figures
are further disaggregated in relation to the extent
of impairment, the numbers of children with
Box 2.1 Changing levels of disability in CEE/CIS
and the Baltic States
Since the break-up of the Soviet Union, many
states in the CEE/CIS and Baltic region have
registered dramatic changes in the recorded
number of children with disabilities. The total
number of children recognized as disabled in of-
ficial
data across the region tripled, from around
500,000 at the onset of transition to 1.5 million
in 2002. In Estonia, for example, the number of
children aged up to 15 with disabilities who were
registered more than doubled from 1,737 in 1989
to 4,722 in 2001, while in Ukraine the number of
children aged up to 17
with disabilities rose from
93,156 in 1992 to 153,453 in 2001.
i
In Uzbekistan,
according to official statistics, there were 33,280
children registered as having an impairment in
1992, while by 1999 this number had increased
to 123,750.
These official data do not reflect the situation
fully. There are additional numbers of children
with disabilities,
especially in rural areas, who
have never been officially registered and who
are effectively hidden because of the stigma at-
tached to their condition.
A detailed discussion of the background to and
possible reasons for these dramatic increases
can be found in the UNICEF report
Children and
Disability in Transition in CEE/CIS and Baltic
States
.
ii
The report attributes these changes to
a combination of
improved identification and
reporting techniques, and in some cases, the
incentive of improved cash benefits for children
with disabilities living in the community.
Sources:
i
Figures provided from UNICEF Innocenti Research
Centre, MONEE database. These data were used in
support of the report ’Children and Disability in Transi-
tion in CEE/CIS and Baltic States’, Innocenti Insight,
UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, 2005.
ii
Ibid.
disabilities living at home or placed in institutions,
and the number enrolled in regular education or
special education systems or receiving benefits.
Although accurate and representative data on
disability are lacking in many parts of the world,
international efforts are underway to improve the
quality and availability of data. In 2005 the United
Nations Statistics Division initiated the systematic
and regular collection of basic statistics on human
functioning and disability by introducing a disability
statistics questionnaire to the existing data
collection system.
6