from institutions to communities
Many of the initiatives that have been discussed,
especially those relating to families and communities,
are essential foundations for the successful
promotion of alternatives to institutional care for
children and adults with disabilities. These include
the introduction of measures that reduce the
pressure for children to be admitted to institutions
in the first place, including the development of
child-centred public services, accessible schools
and the provision of local supports and services.
94
These elements can be complemented by the
development of support programmes for and by
families and the establishment of community-based
alternatives. These new community services can be
developed with the active involvement of parents and
community organizations.
Immediate changes that might be introduced
in existing institutions include restricting new
admissions where alternative support structures are
already established, improving the quality of services
and protections against abuse, and regrouping
children into smaller ’family style’ units, where
girls and boys of a range of ages and abilities live
in smaller groups with a ’house’ parent or parents.
Sometimes such smaller family groups can be set up
in the local community.
95
Overreliance on institutional care for children in
Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet
Union has in turn encouraged a number of new
initiatives for deinstitutionalization, with positive
results. As an example, in the Saratov region of
the Russian Federation, a Rehabilitation Centre for
Disabled Children has been established with the aim
of preventing institutionalization. The Centre sends
out mobile teams of professionals who provide
rehabilitation services to children with disabilities
living at home. As in the Portage programme, they
teach children skills to facilitate their inclusion into
society. Family members, who are informed of their
legal rights and entitlements as caregivers, are also
trained to support children. The Centre has served
many thousands of children and family members.
96
(See box 6.5 for examples from Bulgaria.)
An important lesson to be drawn from these
initiatives is that deinstitutionalization programmes
must go hand in hand with relevant developments at
the community level. Structures must be changed,
appropriate long-term support mechanisms need to
be put in place in the community, and understanding
and acceptance of children with disabilities in wider
society must be promoted for deinstitutionalization
not to give rise to its own set of difficulties. For
example, sexual and physical abuse is a risk in
the community just as it is in institutions, and a
child’s right to protection can be reinforced by the
establishment of an independent oversight system to
monitor protection issues.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |