|
Advantages and Disadvantages
Compared to other technologies, Among the different biometric techniques,
facial recognition may not be most reliable and efficient.
However, one key
advantage is that it does not require the cooperation of the test subject to work.
Properly designed systems installed in airports, multiplexes, and other public
places can identify individuals among the crowd, without passers-by even being
aware of the system. Other biometrics like fingerprints, iris scans, and speech
recognition cannot perform this kind of mass identification. However, questions
have been raised on the effectiveness of facial recognition software in cases of
railway and airport security.
Weaknesses
Face recognition is not perfect and struggles to perform under certain
conditions. Ralph Gross, a researcher at the Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute,
describes one obstacle related to the viewing angle of the face: "Face recognition
has been getting pretty good at full frontal faces and 20 degrees off, but as soon as
you go towards profile, there've been problems. "Other conditions where face
recognition does not work well include poor lighting, sunglasses, long hair, or
other objects partially covering the subject’s face, and low resolution images.
Another serious disadvantage is that many systems are less effective if facial
expressions vary. Even a big smile can render the system less effective. For
instance: Canada now allows only neutral facial expressions in passport photos.
On several different occasions, firms like Google, Flickr and Nikon been criticized
for their software's lack of ability to recognize faces with darker toned skin colors.
There is also inconstancy in the datasets used by researchers. Researchers may use
anywhere from several subjects to scores of subjects, and a few hundred images to
thousands of images. It is important for researchers to make available the datasets
they used to each other, or have at least a standard dataset.
On 18 January 2013 Japanese researchers created a privacy visor that uses
nearly infrared light to make the face underneath it unrecognizable to facial
recognition software.
Effectiveness
Critics of the technology complain that the London Borough of New
ham scheme has, as of 2004, never recognized a single criminal, despite several
criminals in the system's database living in the Borough and the system having
been running for several years. "Not once, as far as the police know, has New
ham’s automatic facial recognition system spotted a live target. This information
seems to conflict with claims that the system was credited with a 34% reduction in
crime (hence why it was rolled out to Birmingham also). However it can be
explained by the notion that when the public is regularly told that they are under
constant video surveillance with advanced face recognition technology, this fear
alone can reduce the crime rate, whether the face recognition system technically
works or does not. This has been the basis for several other face recognition based
security systems, where the technology itself does not work particularly well but
the user's perception of the technology does.
An experiment in 2002 by the local police department in Tampa, Florida,
had similarly disappointing results. A system at Boston's Logan Airport was shut
down in 2003 after failing to make any matches during a two-year test period.
Privacy issues
Civil rights right organizations and privacy campaigners such as
the Electronic Frontier Foundation
and the ACLU
express concern that privacy is
being compromised by the use of surveillance technologies. Some fear that it could
lead to a “total surveillance society,” with the government and other authorities
having the ability to know the whereabouts and activities of all citizens around the
clock. This knowledge has been, is being, and could continue to be deployed to
prevent the lawful exercise of rights of citizens to criticize those in office, specific
government policies or corporate practices. Many centralized power structures
with such surveillance capabilities have abused their privileged access to maintain
control of the political and economic apparatus, and to curtail populist reforms.
Facial recognition can be used not just to identify an individual, but also to
unearth other personal data associated with an individual – such as other photos
featuring the individual, blog posts, social networking profiles, Internet behavior,
travel patterns, etc. All through facial features alone. Moreover, individuals have
limited ability to avoid or thwart facial recognition tracking unless they hide their
faces. This fundamentally changes the dynamic of day-to-day privacy by enabling
any marketer, government agency, or random stranger to secretly collect the
identities and associated personal information of any individual captured by the
facial recognition system[12].
Social media web sites such as Facebook have very large numbers of
photographs of people, annotated with names. This represents a database which
could potentially be used (or abused) by governments for facial recognition
purposes. In July 2012, a hearing was held before the Subcommittee on Privacy,
Technology and the Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate,
to address issues surrounding what facial recognition technology means for privacy
and civil liberties.
In 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information Association
(NTIA) began a multi-stakeholder process to engage privacy advocates and
industry representatives to establish guidelines regarding the use of facial
recognition technology by private companies. In June 2015, privacy advocates left
the bargaining table over what they felt was an impasse based on the industry
representatives being unwilling to agree to consent requirements for the collection
of facial recognition data. The NTIA and industry representatives continued
without the privacy representatives, and draft rules are expected to be presented in
the spring of 2016.
States have begun enacted legislation to protect citizen's biometric data
Privacy Act in 2008. Facebook's Deep Face has become the subject of several class
action lawsuits under the Biometric Information Privacy Act, with claims alleging
that Facebook is collecting and storing facial recognition data of its users without
obtaining informed consent, in direct violation of the Biometric Information
Privacy Act. The most recent case was dismissed in January 2016 because the
court lacked jurisdiction. Therefore, it is still unclear if the Biometric Information
Privacy Act will be effective in protecting biometric data privacy rights.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: | 
