L.
Performance of the Asian Development Bank
31.
ADB’s performance is rated
satisfactory
. ADB promptly supported an important
government initiative at appraisal, provided regular inputs and feedback during project
implementation, and kept regular contact with the PMO and the executing agency. In addition to
regular portfolio reviews, ADB conducted five missions from loan inception in 2008 to project
review in July 2012. The midterm review mission was completed late in December 2011–
January 2012. The decision not to rebid the GFMIS package may be questioned but it was
justified under the circumstances as it allowed the government to save significant resources.
ADB reviewed bidding and evaluation documents and demonstrated flexibility when changes
were required to move the project forward. However, there were delays because contract
packages were changed, procurement procedural differences between the government and
ADB delayed bid opening, and technical evaluation completion and review were delayed. ADB
could have been more assertive and required the engagement of a resident long-term IT and
procurement expert to support PMO building capacity in the executing agency for such complex
procurement. It would have been better if ADB also continued to support the government by
approving an additional TA grant to help with PFM reforms after the loan was closed.
III.
EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
A.
Relevance
32.
The project is
less than relevant
at completion. The project was not implemented on time,
and the planned PFM reforms did not occur as planned. The delay in GFMIS procurement
resulted in delayed benefits to beneficiaries. The project is marginally completed as of June
2017, as the GFMIS rollout started only in June 2017. The project also deviated from the
government’s approach to the PFM Reform Strategy, 2007–2018. In addition, the government is
undergoing changes following its new development strategy of delegating more responsibilities
to provinces. Evaluating the project’s impact is difficult as the revised strategy, which was
adopted only in February 2017, is required to accurately evaluate progress to date and devise
the way forward.
21
33.
ADB’s involvement with the IMF was important in developing the PFM Reform Strategy,
2007–2018. ADB’s financing of major costs was critical in designing an adequate schedule of
software requirements and technical specifications that provided a sound basis for procurement.
The equipment procured helps the government implement its PFM reform strategy and improve
the country’s economic management, leading to more transparent, effective, and efficient public
resource management. While the project experienced difficulties, the problems are related more
to procurement issues and less to the PFM reform.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |