Monopolistic competition
Th
is is the market structure closest to the model of perfect
competition because of the large number of competing
suppliers.
Monopolistic competition has the following
characteristics:
■
There is a large number of buyers and sellers.
■
There are few barriers to entry into the market and it is easy
for firms to recoup their capital
expenditure on exit from
the market.
■
Consumers face a wide choice of diff erentiated products.
Each firm has a slight degree of monopoly power in that
it controls its own brand through quality and physical
diff erences.
■
Firms have some influence on the market price and are
therefore price makers.
Each fi rm is competing with a large number of similar
producers. In this situation
the demand curve facing the
individual fi rm will be downward-sloping but relatively
price elastic because of the presence of substitutes. It is an
option for fi rms to reduce their price in order to increase
total revenue. As in perfect competition,
the fi rms can
make abnormal profi t in the short run but the key restraint
on their power is the free entry of rivals. In the long
run, profi t-maximising fi rms will only be able to achieve
normal profi t covering all the production costs and the
opportunity cost of capital.
Th
e clue to the behaviour
of fi rms in this market
structure lies in the concept of product diff erentiation.
Th
e development of a strong brand image must be seen
as an act of investment on the part of the individual fi rm.
Th
is highlights the important role that advertising and
promotions play in this market structure. Successful
advertising will not only shift the fi rm’s demand curve
to the right at the expense of rivals but will also reduce
the price elasticity of demand
if the consumers feel there
are no close substitutes. Th
is is what is meant by brand
loyalty – people will not easily shift back to rival products.
Th
ere are problems associated with advertising because
it is a competitive tool taken up by all fi rms. One could
argue that the advantage will be temporary and that
advertising will simply add to the fi rm’s costs
and bring
little benefi t to its demand curve. If advertising is not
eff ective for all fi rms, those who are successful might take
advantage of their greater market share and brand loyalty
to charge a higher price. Th
ese fi rms
would increase their
sales revenue and by doing so move to the portion of the
demand curve where price elasticity of demand has a value
less than 1, i.e., inelastic.
It is easy to see how each fi rm can try to strengthen its
market power in the short run. Th
e constraint on fi rms is
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: