I agreed that there was much to be said for her view, but I was not entirely satisfied. For
in each suspicious instance Pagett had been shown as the directing genius.
It was true that
his personality seemed to lack the assurance and decision that one would expect from a
master criminal—but after all, according to Colonel Race, it was brain work only that this
mysterious leader supplied, and creative genius is often allied to a weak and timorous
physical constitution.
“There speaks the Professor’s daughter,” interrupted Suzanne, when I had got to this point
in my argument.
“It’s true, all the same. On the other hand, Pagett may be the Grand Vizier, so to speak, of
the All Highest.” I was silent for a minute or two, and then went on musingly: “I wish I
knew how Sir Eustace made his money!”
“Suspecting him again?”
“Suzanne, I’ve got into that state that I can’t help suspecting somebody! I don’t really
suspect him—but, after all, he
is
Pagett’s employer, and he
did
own the Mill House.”
“I’ve always heard that he made his money in some way he isn’t anxious to talk about,”
said Suzanne thoughtfully. “But that doesn’t necessarily mean crime—it might be tintacks or
hair restorer!”
I agreed ruefully.
“I suppose,” said
Suzanne doubtfully, “that we’re not barking up the wrong tree? Being
led completely astray, I mean, by assuming Pagett’s complicity? Supposing that, after all, he
is a perfectly honest man?”
I considered that for a minute or two, then I shook my head.
“I can’t believe that.”
“After all, he has his explanations for everything.”
“Y—es, but they’re not very convincing. For instance, the night he tried to throw me
overboard on the
Kilmorden,
he says he followed Rayburn up on deck and Rayburn turned
and knocked him down. Now we know that’s not true.”
“No,” said Suzanne unwillingly. “But we only heard the story at second hand from Sir
Eustace. If we’d heard it direct from Pagett himself, it might have been different. You know
how people always get a story a little wrong when they repeat it.”
I turned the thing over in my mind.
“No,” I said at last, “I don’t see any way out. Pagett’s guilty. You can’t get away from the
fact that he tried to throw me overboard, and everything else fits in. Why are you so
persistent in this new idea of yours?”
“Because of his face.”
“His face? But—”
“Yes, I know what you’re going to say. It’s a sinister face. That’s just it. No man with a
face like that could be really sinister. It must be a colossal joke on the part of Nature.”
I did not believe much in Suzanne’s argument. I know a lot about Nature in past ages. If
she’s
got a sense of humour, she doesn’t show it much. Suzanne is just the sort of person
who would clothe Nature with all her own attributes.
We passed on to discuss our immediate plans. It was clear to me that I must have some
kind of standing. I couldn’t go on avoiding explanations forever. The solution of all my
difficulties lay ready to my hand, though I didn’t think of it for some time. The
Daily
Budget!
My silence or my speech could no longer affect Harry Rayburn. He was marked
down as “The Man in the Brown Suit” through no fault of mine. I could help him best by
seeming to be against him. The “Colonel” and his gang must have no suspicion that there
existed any friendly feeling between me and the man they had elected to be the scapegoat of
the murder at Marlow. As far as I knew, the woman killed was still unidentified. I would
cable
to Lord Nasby, suggesting that she was no other than the famous Russian dancer
“Nadina” who had been delighting Paris for so long. It seemed incredible to me that she had
not been identified already—but when I learnt more of the case long afterwards I saw how
natural it really was.
Nadina had never been to England, during her successful career in Paris. She was
unknown to London audiences. The pictures in the papers of the Marlow victim were so
blurred and unrecognizable that it is small wonder no one identified them. And, on the other
hand, Nadina had kept her intention of visiting England a profound secret from everyone.
The day after the murder, a letter had been received by her manager purporting to be from
the dancer, in which she said that she was returning to Russia on urgent private affairs and
that he must deal with her broken contract as best he could.
All this, of course, I only learned afterwards. With Suzanne’s full approval, I sent a long
cable from De Aar. It arrived at a psychological moment (this again, of course,
I learnt
afterwards). The
Daily Budget
was hard up for a sensation. My guess was verified and
proved to be correct and the
Daily Budget
had the scoop of its lifetime. “Victim of the Mill
House Murder identified by our special reporter.” And so on. “Our reporter makes voyage
with the murderer. The Man in the Brown Suit. What he is really like.”
The main facts were, of course, cabled to the South African papers, but I only read my
own lengthy articles at a much later date! I received approval and full instructions by cable
at Bulawayo. I was on the staff of the
Daily Budget,
and I had a private word of
congratulation from Lord Nasby himself. I was definitely
accredited to hunt down the
murderer, and I, and only I, knew that the murderer was not Harry Rayburn! But let the
world think that it was he—best so for the present.