Theodore Peterson brought the history to 1964 with his exploration of major trends and
. Changes
occurred more quickly in the six years after 1956 than in any other time since the printing of the
first magazine Peterson claimed. He praised the work of Mott and Wood while noting that these
scholars’ books were “silent about many of the developments in the industry since the turn of the
demise of magazines for older children from ages of nine to 16 to the arrival of radio and
television and the rise of the market for younger readers between two and 12 to the fact that their
16
To Market
Judith S. Duke’s
Children’s Books and Magazines: A Market Study
is a concise look at
the state of children’s publishing in 1979 with predictions for the future. Duke provided an
analysis of demographic, economic, and social trends affecting the industry because “today as
never before the juvenile industry is faced with questions about its future.”
45
Writing six years
before Kelly, Duke noted “there have been few, if any, books written on the business of
publishing children’s literature and the outlook for that business.”
46
Juvenile magazines of the 1970s targeted all ages and interests through varied circulation
and marketing strategies. Then as now, most children’s general magazines relied on subscription
sales rather than advertising and newsstand sales. Subscription costs varied depending on the
source—acquiring a subscriber was more expensive than retaining one.
Renewal rates are relatively meaningless in the children’s magazine industry. Children’s
periodicals have lower renewals than the rest of the industry because children constantly outgrow
publications. Most solicitations are conducted by direct mail and juvenile magazine promoters
must study to know their market. Both Parents’ Magazine Enterprises and Curtis Publishing have
lines of juvenile magazines serving three- to 14-year-olds so that as a child outgrows one
magazine, she can be promoted to the next.
The juvenile industry of the 1970s was beset by problems and change. Some were
common to the publishing industry as a whole—such as rising costs and postage—while others
were unique to the youth market. Despite the lower birth rate slowing the growth of juvenile
magazines at that time, Duke predicated in 1979, “they will continue to have a market, and the
future may be brightest for those catering to a specialized audience.”
47
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: