participating in the Spain bombing.
″We have a Bible in the house. He′s not a fundamentalist -
- he thought it was something different and very unique″,
Mayfield told the associated press of her husband′s
conversion to Islam.
To prove his innocence, Mayfield tried to downplay her
husband′s commitment to Islam. She even felt the need to
justify his conversion-as if that were his crime.
Mosque administrator Shahriar Ahmed took a similar
approach to defend Mayfield. ″He was seen as a
moderate,″ Ahmed told reporters. ″Mayfield showed up
for the Friday ritual of shedding his shoes, washing his
bare feet and sitting on the carpets to hear services. He did
not, as some devout Muslims do, pray five times a day at
the mosque.″
The implication here is that Brandon Mayfield′s guilt or
innocence was in some way related to how many times he
prayed at the mosque. Ahmed even went on to assert, ″He
was on the less religious side if anything.″
These ′less religious′ icons of what an ′acceptable′ Muslim
should look like can be found all over the media. Irshad
Manji, media entrepreneur and author of The Trouble with
Islam, is one of the most celebrated of these icons. Manji
is widely published and has appeared in all the top media
outlets. She even received Oprah′s Chutzpah Award for
″gutsiness″.
Although Manji refers to herself as a ″Muslim refusenik″,
the media refers to her as the model of a ″practicing
Muslim″. Daniel Pipes, a board member of the United
States Institute of Peace, calls her a ″courageous,
moderate, modern Muslim″. But interestingly, Manji′s
ideas have less to do with Islam than Pipes′ ideas have to
do with peace. A Washington Post article describes
Manji′s epiphany about prayer-the cornerstone of the
Islamic faith:
″Instead, she said, she began praying on her own.
After washing her feet, arms and face, she would sit
on a velvet rug and turn toward Mecca. Eventually,
she stopped this as well, because she did not want to
fall ′into mindless submission and habitual
submissiveness’.″
Manji is welcome to her opinion about this practice of 1.5
billion people worldwide. She is also welcome to
abandon any and all of these practices. But Manji is not
simply depicted as an insignificant woman who decided
not to pray. Her personal decision to abandon central
tenants of her faith-so long as that faith is Islam- is
portrayed as a fight for freedom. A fight against tyranny.
She is ′courageous′ and ′gutsy′, a model for other not-too-
Islamic Muslims to follow.
Making this the model is like asking someone not to be
′too black′ or ′too Jewish′ as if these were in essence bad
or violent and anyone who struggled only to be
′moderately black′ or ′moderately Jewish′ was a freedom
fighter. For example, Manji told the Washington Post:
″The violence is going to happen, then why not risk it
happening for the sake of freedom?″
Yes. Freedom is good. Manji may have said it better.
Kerry may have said it subtler. But a business management
professor at California′s Imperial Valley College said it
truer: ″The only way to end Islamic terrorism is to
eliminate the Islamic religion.″
But regardless of how you say it, one thing is for sure:
when it comes to Islam these days-less is definitely more.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |