independence. Central bank law cannot be complete in separating the authority
to be binding in practice. Tradition or governor's personality may, among others,
Central Bank Independence…
S&A No. 120
17
significantly influence central bank behaviour. Cukierman (1992) and Cukierman et al.
(1992) propose two “behavioural” indices of independence. First one is based on an
average turnover of the governor in 1950-89. It is argued that, below some threshold,
shorter term in office disables the governor to implement long-run policy and thus
makes him more susceptible to political pressure and less independent . This index has
two drawbacks. It may be argued that the subservient governor can stay in office
longer than the one who follows his own, independent policy. Secondly, the index
does not capture the “conservative bias” of the bank, i.e., its independence in pursuing
the objective of price stability. Despite of these drawbacks the turnover rate seems to
be a good measure of independence for developing countries, where the general
adherence to the law is weaker than in Western democracies. This tentative conclusion
is supported by the fact that the turnover rate in developing countries is much higher
and more variable than in developed economies.
Another “behavioural” index presented by Cukierman (1992) and Cukierman et
al (1992) is based on questionnaire sent to the central banks' staff. The questionnaire
contains questions on legal aspects of independence, actual practice where it differs
from that codified by law, monetary policy objectives, targets and instruments.
Correlation between legal and questionnaire-based indices of CBI is low, indicating
that these two measures reflect different dimensions of independence. However, the
correlation is significantly higher for a group of developed countries where the
compliance with the law is higher.
Cukierman and Webb (1995) build an index based on political vulnerability of
the central bank governor. They find that the average propensity to replace the
governor is significantly higher after political transition than in other periods. The cut-
off between “political” and “non-political” period is six months. Vulnerability within
this period is three times higher in developing countries than in developed economies
and can be interpreted as another “behavioural” index of independence.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: