|
References
Alameen, G. (2011). Learner digital stories in a Web 2.0 age.
TESOL Journal
, 2:355-369.
Aliakbari, M. & Toni, A. (2009). On the effects of error correction strategies on the
grammatical accuracy of the Iranian English learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association
of Applied Linguistics, 13: 99-112.
Beshears, F. (2005). A case for creative commons textbooks. Retrieved 22/2/14 from
http://innovationmemes.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/case-for-creative-commonstextbooks.
html#!/2010/09/case-for-creative-commons-textbooks.html
Bilbro, J., Iluzada, C., & Clark, D. (2013). Responding effectively to composition
students: Comparing student perceptions of written and audio feedback. Journal on
Excellence in College Teaching, 24:47-83.
Burston, J. (2001). Computer-mediated feedback in composition correction. CALICO
Journal, 19:37-50.
Danis, M. (1987). The voice in the margins: Paper-marking as conversation. Freshman
English News, 15:18-20.
Daisey, P. (2009). The writing experiences and beliefs of secondary Diez-Bedmar, M. &
Perez-Paredes, P. (2012). The types and effects of peer native speakers' feedback on
CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16:62-90.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63: 97-107.
Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing
studies. Language Teaching, 45: 446-459.
Finley, T. (2006). Web 2.0 writing feedback with Create a Graph. Teaching English in the
Two-Year College, 34:202-205.
-115-
2014 CALL Conference
LINGUAPOLIS
www.antwerpcall.be
Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New
York: Routledge.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Web-writing 2.0: Enabling, documenting, and assessing writing
online. Language Learning & Technology, 12:7-12.
Lee, C., Cheung, W., Wong, K., & Lee, F. (2013). Immediate web-based essay critiquing
system feedback and teacher follow-up feedback on young second language learners'
writings: An experimental study in a Hong Kong secondary school. Computer Assisted
Language Learning, 26:39-60.
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary
classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17:144-164.
Lu, J. & Law, N. (2012), Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective
feedback. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences,
40:257-275.
McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. (2007). Listen and learn: A systematic review of the evidence
that podcasting supports learning in higher education. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale
(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and
Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 1669-1677). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved
24/2/2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/25596.
Menezes, H. (2012). Using digital storytelling to improve literacy skills. International
Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS), paper presented at the
IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age
(CELDA), Madrid, Spain, Oct 19-21.
Montgomery, J. & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions,
teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 16: 82-99.
Nelson, M. & Schunn, C. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer
feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science: An International Journal of
the Learning Sciences, 37:375-401.
Patchan, M., Hawk, B., Stevens, C., & Schunn, C. (2013). The effects of skill diversity on
commenting and revisions. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 41:381-405.
Pifarre, M. & Fisher, R. (2011). Breaking up the writing process: How wikis can support
understanding the composition and revision strategies of young writers. Language and
Education, 25:451-466.
Rosalia, C. (2010). EFL students as peer advisors in an online writing center. Ed.D.
Dissertation, New York University.
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of
corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32: 303-334.
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dunnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's
competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback
perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20:291-303.
-116-
2014 CALL Conference
LINGUAPOLIS
www.antwerpcall.be
Sweeney, M. (1999). Relating revision skills to teacher commentary. Teaching English in
The Two-year College, 27: 213-218.
Treglia, M. (2009). Teacher-written commentary in college writing composition: How
does it impact student revisions? Composition Studies, 37: 67-86.
Turuk, M. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in
the second language classroom. ARECLS, 5:244-262.
Vandercook, S. (2012). Exploring the relationship between English composition teachers'
beliefs about written feedback and their written feedback practices. PhD dissertation,
University of New Orleans.
Vigil, N. & Oller, J. (1976). Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning 26:
281-295.
Vurdien, R. (2011). Enhancing writing skills through blogs in an EFL class. European
Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning (EUROCALL), paper presented at
the EUROCALL Annual Conference, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Aug 31-Sep 3.
Wang, S. & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the
research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29:412-430.
Ware, P. & O'Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration.
Language Learning & Technology, 12:43-63.
Woo, M., Chu, S., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated
collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61:279-309.
Yang, Y.-F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 42:687-700.
Yeh, S.-W. & Lo, J.-J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and
corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52:882-892.
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher
feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom.
Assessing Writing, 15:3-17.
-117-
2014 CALL Conference
LINGUAPOLIS
www.antwerpcall.be
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
