Modifications on text due to comments in meeting in Paris 23rd-27th Nov. 2015, Chapters 2.6 and 5. added, Chapter 4 modified. All later comments and contributions taken into account. Version for final reviews by project leaders.
Work package leader has duly considered comments by JSI and NUBIKI
6
28.04.2016
E. Raimond, N. Rahni
All
Final review. Few modifications proposed before report issuance. An example of fragility analysis and compliance of the report with the PSA End-Users Needs is also proposed in appendix.
7
09.05.2016
H. Löffler
Summary, 2.8.2
Modifications as agreed between CCA and IRSN accepted.
8
04.10.2016
H. Löffler
7.3
Update according to the ASAMPSA_E end-user’s workshop September 2016 (summary of conclusions below):
The interest and feasibility of a PSA modeling exactly each DiD level (especially levels 1 and 2) has to be investigated ; proposal for a L2 PSA for multi-unit site seems interesting but needs further developments to be used as it is presented. Recommendations (1) consider all reviewers' comments (2) promote "graded" approach for the development of L2 PSA for external events (3) introduce the discussion on low quality data for rare IE events (natural hazards) and how it considered for L2 PSA development (shall we exclude such IE from L2 PSA ?, how to be consistent in risk metrics applications ? Shall ASAMPSA_E promote full-scope integrated PSA (all IE in one PSA) or promote separated PSA (one PSA for each type of IE in order to avoid mixing situations with different quality in IE data) (4) Comment more precisely the choice to be done between L1-L2 integrated or separated methodologies in the context of external hazards).
9
2.11.2016
J.Vitazkova
all
2.2
7.2
Modifications according to comments of Tractebel, LEI, JANSI and EDF – mostly format, formulations
