Ministry of Higher and Secondary Education Bukhara State University Foreign

Ministry of Higher and Secondary Education

Bukhara State University Foreign
Languages faculty 11-1ing-17 group
SATTOROVA SHAHLO

Theme: Charles Dicken’s David Copperfield: New Critical Reconsiderations

Checked by: PHD M.B.Akhmedova

Charles Dicken’s David Copperfield:New Critical Reconsiderations

Abstract:The current study focuses on a critical review of Charles Dickens ’David Copperfield.Charles Dickens is probably the greatest — if not the most perfect — storyteller whose works have become synonymous with construction England.Many of his novels came out in monthly payments and were eagerly awaited by his readers.His popularity lay in his awareness, his ability to write sentimental stories, filled with memorable characters.More seriously, his novels are detailed about the pros and cons of construction life.In a semi-autobiographical David Copperfield, the author describes a graphic depiction of the living conditions of the urban poor.He also condemns the cruel nature of society’s exploitation and construction of children by adults.
In short, characters like Mikavber (a portrait of Dickens based on his own father) have passed into folk lore and become household names used by people who have never read Dickens novel in their lives.In addition, the writer uses a lot of black paint.However, he wanted to elevate goodness and kindness in the hearts of the people and used his tears and laughter to achieve his goals.He probably brought some improvement in some cases, but too often, he didn’t get it.
Keywords:Reconsidering critical popularity, victorian life.
1.Introduction: The middle third of the nineteenth century saw the peak of the popularity of the English novel, and the main indicator of this popularity was Charles Dickens (1812-1870).Chaudhuri (1992) as opines:
Dickens has a unique position in English literature for his special form of self-expression in prose, fiction.Dickens’s artistic method, his choice of material and his manner of rendering that material, is Dickens’s style.The other parts of Dickens’s art, his situations, actions and characters and the meaning that they carry, rest upon style and take their essence from it.(p.32)
Dickens was one of the first novelists to be extremely influential, with whom he awakened the conscience of the people by feeling the sufferings of the poor, the violent imaginations that described their lives.In scale and vitality, and in the creation of permanent characters, Dickens has no rival among English novelists.Dickens has only recently been studied as a literary artist.His work was largely due to the fact that he wrote in anticipation of the press.Like Shakespeare, he was willing to adapt his material to what the audience demanded, as there was no element for art in his novels or journalism.Dickens was a shrewd man who exploited his gifts as a reader of his own stories in his later years.He worked so hard on himself that he shortened his life.
Indeed, Dickens is a difficult novelist to write in a short time.First, he is an accepted genius of the English novel, he can provoke the very natural wrath of readers like Shakespeare, the institution, and the literary institutions, who are outraged by the rest of the difficulties.Second, in collaboration with a number of other great novelists, his works, such as The Tale of the Two Cities (1859), suffer from the frequent teaching in schools.Davies (1990) asserts:
From the proof now available, it is perfectly clear that Dickens studied the art of writing with enthusiasm and zeal..Tending to cumulative excitement, using action in contrast, and introducing symbolic overtones, he is one of the most painstaking of English novelists.
Dickens dominates the first half of Victoria’s reign, and his works help one to discern the centers of interaction between “literature” and “society” in the period.One main chief concern in his work is the description of the “condition of England”.Another is the examination of prevailing economic doctrines concerning poverty population, and the scope of public responsibility.The third is the attempt to suggest more handsome and humanitarian alternatives to those doctrines, a work in which they had the assistance of all those who were influenced by the aspirations of the earlier Romantics, especially of Coleridge, and by the revival of religious feeling and speculation about a more religious order of society (Chaudhuri, 1992).
The foundation of Dickens ’art, as an observer, as a brilliant writer of nineteenth-century urban life, was his extreme, grotesque, and unnatural eyes. The modern embarrassment that frees the eyes from physical or mental features, unconsciously trying to iron out the differences between men, cannot be further from Dickens’s peculiar views. He neglected the important spirit of the people, the spirits, the atmosphere; he elevated them, and he compelled the reader to acknowledge the infinite variety and richness of what he saw. Many of his novels are animated by a sense of social injustice. He was the first novelist to fully describe the consequences of the disintegration of cities and some of the negative aspects of the Victorian era. But Dickens was not a radical thinker, and his characters never considered rebellion. He evokes the conscience of his contemporaries by depicting scenes of poverty and despair
Dickens was never an intellectual (the critic described the theme of all his novels as “people should be nice to each other”), but he was always in close contact with students from all walks of life. He was an actor of some genius, sometimes obsessive with his interest in drama and amateur theater. The angry power he showed all his life was in a train wreck that was close to death, and he was involved. Because he was satisfied with the closeness and relevance of the live audience, and because he could always write for his students as he did, he began a very successful public reading from his work, but it was also a great strain. and almost contributed to his relatively early death. He was recognized as a genius throughout his life. Subsequent centuries may have changed the view of what was most valuable in his work; but no one could deny that he was a genius.
In conclusion, the energy of energy is preserved mainly in the novels that date back to his childhood, while David Copperfield – a very imaginative but emotionally true about his childhood – contains his captivating cartoons. Mr. Mikavber (based on Dickens’s father) and the repressive Uriah Hip, terribly inflexible with a snake-like curl and transparent false humility. Current research focuses on a critical review of his undoubted work (David Copperfield) and some related issues.
2.Charles Dicken’s Contribution,Reputation and Literary Career
2.1 Dicken’s Life :Family and Social Background.
The most famous Victorian writer, Charles Dickens, was born on February 7, 1812, in Portsmouth. His father, a servant in the Navy office, was a wasteful and irresponsible of money, so life was difficult for the large Dickens family. In 1822 they moved to the poor outskirts of London, where Charles’s father, Charles, was twelve years old, hoping to find good opportunities when his father was imprisoned for his debts. Charles was sent to work in terrible conditions in the factory. Memories of this traumatic period inspired his later correspondence, in particular his most autobiographical work, David Copperfield (1849-1850). In this turbulent period. Charles’s education received almost no attention at all. However, he became an angry reader, acquainted with the works of Henry Fielding and Cervantes, among others.