Ministry of education and science of the republic of tajikistan

Conclusion.

The realization of the right is impossible without understanding the content of legal norms, clarifying the will of the legislator contained in them. This process of identifying the will in legal science and practice is defined by the concept of "interpretation of law". The interpretation of law is the establishment of a meaning that is objectively expressed in the verbal formula of a normative act. A number of scholars believe that interpretation includes two separate components: clarification and clarification of the law. Others justify such a division only for methodological purposes. Clarification of legal acts is achieved by various methods of interpretation. Interpretation techniques are a relatively separate set of ways to analyze the norms of law. There are grammatical, logical, systematic, historical-political, special-legal, teleological and functional interpretations. Grammatical interpretation is a set of techniques aimed at clarifying the morphological and syntactic structure of the text of the act, identifying the meaning of individual words and terms, and the grammatical meaning of the entire sentence. Logical interpretation involves the use of laws and rules of logic to understand the true meaning of a legal norm, which sometimes does not coincide with its literal image. Systematic interpretation is the study of a legal act in terms of its relationship to other norms. Historical and political interpretation consists in studying the historical situation of the publication of the norm, the socio-economic and political factors that led to the creation of the act. Special legal interpretation is associated with the analysis of special terms, technical and legal means and methods of expressing the will of the legislator. Teleological (target) interpretation is aimed at establishing the objectives of the publication of legal acts. Functional interpretation examines the factors and conditions under which the interpreted norm functions and is implemented. Interpretation techniques should be used together, not individually. The result of the use of various methods of understanding the meaning of the text of normative acts is the conclusion about the scope of their application to this case. Interpretation by volume is a logical continuation and completion of the understanding of the content of legal norms. The scope of the interpretation is divided into adequate, restrictive and pervasive.

Usually, the rules of law are interpreted adequately (literally). Restrictive and broad interpretation is applied when the content (meaning) of the interpreted norm and its textual expression do not coincide, which is an exception to the general rule. The types of explanations of legal acts differ depending on the subjects that carry out the interpretation. The official interpretation is given either by the body that issued the act (autentic), or by the body authorized by law (legal). Acts of official interpretation are mandatory for law enforcement officers. Informal interpretation is not legally binding. There are ordinary interpretations given by citizens, competent interpretations given by people who are knowledgeable in law (specialists), and doctrinal interpretations given by scientists who conduct research in this area. Depending on the scope of the acts, there is a distinction between normative and casual interpretation. The normative interpretation is abstract and applies to an indefinite range of persons and cases. The casual interpretation is designed to solve a particular case. Ultimately, the interpretation of the law as a legal activity serves to ensure the rule of law and improve the effectiveness of legal regulation .