Lecture 2
Dimensions and levels of linguistic analysis: syntagmatic
and paradigmatic relations between lingual units.
Hierarchical structuring of language system.
By virtue of their potentiality of occurrence in a certain context lingual units enter into
relations of two different kinds. When elements combine with others along a horizontal
dimension, they enter into syntagmatic relations.
Syntagmatic relations are immediate linear
relations between lingual units of the same level in a segmental sequence (string). For example:
“A very beautiful girl is talking to my brother in the yard.”
In this sentence syntagmatically connected are the words and word-groups:
a girl
,
a beau-
tiful girl
,
is talking
,
a beautiful girl is talking
,
is talking to my brother
,
is talking in the yard
.
Theoretical Course of English Grammar
Script by prof.
Nino Kirvalidze
9
Morphemes within the words are also connected syntagmatically. E.g.: beauti/ful, talk/ing.
Phonemes and graphemes are connected syntagmatically within morphemes and words.
The combination of two words or word-groups in a segmental sequence, one of which is
modified by the other, forms a unit which is referred to as a syntactic “syntagma.”
There are
four main types of notional syntagmas:
1.
predicative syntagma, which represents a combination of a subject and a predi-
cate. For instance:
A very beautiful girl is talking
or
a girl is talking
.
2.
objective syntagma, which represents a combination of a verb and its object. For
instance:
is talking to my brother
.
3.
attributive syntagma, which represents a combination of a noun and its attribute.
For instance:
a beautiful girl
;
my brother
.
4.
adverbial syntagma, which represents a combination of a modified notional
word, such as a verb, adjective or adverb, with its adverbial modifier. For in-
stance: i
s talking in the yard
( a verb with its adverbial modifier of place);
very
beautiful
(an adjective with its adverbial modifier of degree).
Different from the rest of syntagmas,
in a predicative syntagma the connection between
its members is of reciprocal (i.e. mutual) nature:
that is, the subject dominates the predicate
determining the person and number of predication (e.g. is talking = 3
rd
person, singular), while
the predicate dominates the subject, ascribing to it some action, state or quality ( A girl is
talking).
Since syntagmatic relations are actually observed in utterances, they are described by
the Latin formula as relations
“in praesentia”
(“in the presence”).
The other type of relations, opposed to syntagmatic and called paradigmatic, exists be-
tween elements of the system outside the strings where they co-occur.
Elements enter into
paradigmatic relations when they have the same potential to appear in the same context and
functionally substitute each other. We have syntagmatic elements in a sequence along the
horizontal dimension, while along the vertical dimension we have paradigmatic elements in
substitution
(Haspelmath 2002: 165)
.
Consider, for example:
Nick
was offensive.
The word on the wall
was offensive.
Theoretical Course of English Grammar
Script by prof.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |