25
that refer to LCA in chemistry education and most of them intended for educational purposes
have been applied at the undergraduate level (Allen & Baskhani, 1992; Nair, 1998; Vervaeke,
2012). This dissertation applies inquiry-based chemistry teaching of life-cycle analysis (LCA)
and life-cycle thinking skills at the junior high school level.
In this dissertation, life-cycle thinking skills are defined as abilities that one is required to
have in order to understand the life-cycle of a product, a process or activity and its
environmental effect at each stage of the life-cycle, to a certain extent. Life-cycle thinking is
recognising and evaluating the amount, quality and effects of the inputs and outputs of a
product life-cycle and seeing the possibilities for improvement (see Figure 3., Section 3.1.2.
and Fava et al., 1991). Exploring a system such as a product life-cycle creates possibilities for
promoting the goals and competences of sustainable development in chemistry (see Section
3.1.).
Novel chemistry learning should be more closely connected to socio-scientific contents (Bulte
et al., 2006). A product LCA is a socio-constructivist and daily life-related, context-based
approach in chemistry (Cantell, 2004, 73; Gilbert, 2006). Life-cycle thinking can be brought
into the teaching of any product or material chemistry. This is important, because students are
the most sluggish with practical tasks related to raw materials (Kärnä et al., 2012). This
situation may be aggravated by the fact that was revealed in the initial analysis of this
dissertation: in current chemistry study books, life-cycle thinking is still either completely
absent or only glanced over. If LCA was presented at all, the topic was most often placed at
the end of the book. The representation of LCA was one-dimensional and no inquiry-based
tasks were present. (Juntunen, 2011) For the chemical industry, it is crucial that chemistry
education promotes the students’ skills for cross-curricular co-operation and sustainability
(Finnish Chemical Industry, 2011; Honkanen, 2013).
Studies about SSI seem to support the notion that SSI are beneficial to the multifaceted skills
required for more sustainable citizenship (Tundo et al., 2000). Previous studies on ESD and
SSI have provoked debate about the potential of SSI in promoting higher order cognitive
skills, such as competencies in communication and evaluation (Zeidler et al., 2005;
Feierabend & Eilks, 2011; Burmeister & Eilks, 2012;
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: