URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.48.3095.
80
Hence, it is important to look at the strict implementation of any belief with re-consideration.
The Scarlet
Letter
is considered a progressive text. Hawthorne tried to embody a pure and
idealistic society where adultery and betrayal appear to be the theme whereas much more
underlie this account. It is not just a story about sin and redemption. It is the trial of religion by
large. What is needed is a different way to think in order to make a change in society. This will
challenge the dominant or the accepted social beliefs. It offers and visualizes another way to
understand and thus to live. This study is a pointer to re-consider the proliferation of any text
that propagates rigid ideologies.
Finally, religion is not entirely life and it cannot be - religion
constitutes the guidelines, which are part of life and should remain so
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ)
Vol.4, Issue 8 April-2017
Copyright
© Society for Science and Education, United Kingdom
81
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baldwin, R. (1966). Social Justice. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Becher, J. (1971). Hawthorne's Historical Allegory. Port Washington: Kennikat Press.
Bell, M. (1971). Hawthorne and the Historical Romance of New England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bowden, H. (n.d.). What is Puritanism? The History, and Differences, of English and American Puritanism.
Retrieved April 08, 2017, from Scholastic.com: https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-
content/what-puritanism.html
Collin Thesaurus of the English Language (Third edition ed.). (2008). Glasgow: HarperCollins Publisher.
Edwards, I. (1865). The Works. London University Press.
Eisinger, G. (1901). The Puritan Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawthorne, N. (1940). The Scarlet Letter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
History.com Staff. (2009). Puritanism. Retrieved April 08, 2017, from History.com:
www.history.com/topics/puritanism
Hopkins, G. (1983). The Complete Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, L. (1905). Puritanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Labedz, L. (Ed.). (1971). Solzhenitsyn: a Documentary Record (1st edition ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Mcpherson, H. (1979). Hawthorne as Myth-Maker: A Study in Imagination. Louisiana University Press.
Mencken, H. (n.d.). H. L. Mencken Quotes. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from Brainy Quote:
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/h/h_l_mencken.html
Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary (11th edition ed.). (2003). Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam Webster
Inc. .
Pearce, R. (Ed.). (1964). Hawthorne Centenary Essays. Ohio State University Press.
Plato. (1927). Apology. (B. Jowett, Trans.) New York: Liveright Publishing Corp.
Soyinka, W. (1972). The Man Died: Prison Notes of Wole Soyinka (1st edition ed.). London: Rex Collings.
The Glorious Qur'an: Text and Translation. (1996). (A. Zidan, & D. Zidan, Trans.) Cairo, Egypt: Islamic Home
Publishing and Distribution.
The New English Bible: New Testament. (1961). New York: Oxford University Press.
Waggoner, H. (1930). Hawthorne, A Critical Study. The Belkanays Press of Harvard University Press.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |