Materials dspartmen 7

METHOD OF C OUSTING WHEN POSITION OF PROFILE SHIFTS AS IT MAY

WHEN ROUNDING SHORT RADIUS CURVES WITH SUPERELEVAT ION , .




METHOD OF PLACING TEMPLATE WHEN LOCATING BUMPS TO BE REDUCED

Benellne approx. Baseline less Height of peak is

25 fa•t chon 26 feet late ti\en ¥pecirica‹io»

BUklP TEMPLATE

December
FIGURE II

APPENDIX B

PROPOSED 25' PROFILOMETER SPECIFICATION

1. Apply to rural primary and interstate projects on which mainline pavement exceeds 14,000 sq. yds.

2. Adjust the contract price paid for 1/10 mile pavement lots according to the following schedule:
Profile Index Price Adjustment Percent of Unit

(Inches/Mile) Band (% Downward) contract Price Allowed

15	or	less	lR	No	Adjustment	100
lB	to	15.01	2R		2	98
21	to	18.01	3 R		5	95
24	to	21.01	4R		10	90

^{Above 24.01} 5R Correct Roughness

The contractor may elect to correct any roughness in lieu of the above price adjustments.

3. Bumps exceeding 0.5 inches high measured with the 25' profilometer will not be permitted.

APPENDIX C

SUMMARY OF 1972 AND 1973 PROFILOMETER TESTING

Table

IA PC Primary-Slip Form

IB PC Primary

(Jobs with a small amount of difficulty) (Jobs with a large amount of difficulty)

IIA ^{PC Secondary-Slip Form (Jobs with a small amount of difficulty)}

HB PC Secondary (Jobs with a large amount of difficulty)

III ^{AC Pavement}

TABLE 1A

PC PRIMARY SUB FORM - JOBS WITM SMALL AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY

Project Contractor

Number Letter Code Code

Miles

Tested

2.10
Profile Index

9.01

Adj us been I Bands

lR 2R §R

15 l§-i8 i8-21

1.90 .20
*4R & 5R Year

21 Tested

B

₃ B


7

9

10 ^E

11

12

13

16

/.12

2.39

.§2

I. 0§ 2.10 6.z6

§. bO

1.86

3.39






i8.₉0

1k.22

10.3*

11.2\

11.26

6.01

12.8o

3.13		2.Ol	.3^0	.42
2.2}	b.28	2.27	0	0	0
2.9Y		2.2/	.30	. 20	.20	”

8. 7o 8.8T 9. 9

2.88 .86

.b2 ⁰

. 93 0

1.57 .30

5.06 .i6

3.^{82 .40}

1.30 .3O

a.89 .3

2.8i .so

2.89 .io

.32

.10

0

.20

.20

. 30

0

.20

0

0

1.06

i0

0

.10

. 3

.18 "

.lO

TABLE 1A

£C PRIMARY SHIP FORM - JOES WITH SMALL AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY (cont.j

Project Contractor

Number Letter Code Code

Miles Tested


Profile Index

7.61

Adjustment Bands

lR 2R

l i -I8

3.01 .10
§R ^{*4R d R Year}

i8-21 21 Tested

1972**

^I

20 B

B

22

23

i.82

3.i6

5.569

z.8g9

*T.3⁶⁰

11.2

.37 lO.14 12.8)

8. 9

1.02 .20

2.18 .§2

*. 59 .T3*

1.922 .bO0

10.94 .kl3

9.30 .Y 0

0

. UI

.100

.231

.300

. 6o

.3#

.1Y6

.900

l9T3

,

«

²⁴ ++.OT5

^2b 10.793

²⁶ .93

2/ B. 0 3)

z8 k.061

11.28

ii.88

8.18

9.9i

8.8 i .too .8oo

^4.762 *.931 ^l.02s

.Y34 .200 0

z.*i8 . s39 o

3. ₃ ⁶¹ . 3⁰⁰ O

.9** I I

0

.076

.A00

123.# 10. 3

9C9J7 io.8i/ ñq 10.₉51

T8.4/ 80+ 4 89

*Information not avsilsble for P.I. 21.01 to 2 .0O

**Zn l97P only random portions of projects were tested

CONTRACTOR TOTALS FROM TABLE ¿A

	Total	Average
COOt[dCtOr	Miles Tested	Profile Index	Adjustmen lR	t 9ands 2R	§R	4R 5R
F	6.b0	8. 8	§.700	.TOO	.200	.100
B	15.93^8	14.0$	% io.99i ^69%	% 454 *5%	3% .66i %	*% 1.832 **%
H	49.8o8		37. T53	. 384	^2.778	. 8g3
	16.188	8.86
	3.65	lO.§Q	§.02 ^83%	.30 8%	.20 5%	.13 4¥
E	1.86	12.8o	1.3^0	.§0	0	.26
	1659	8. /8	13. l	1.62	,62
	7.90		6.3^0	.6O	.20	.8o ion
A	2.10	9.01				0

TABLE IB

PC PRIMARY - JOBS WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY

Project Contractor Number Letter Code Code

Adjustment Bands

Miles Profile lR 2R 3# *4R & 5R Year

i’ested Index 15 15-18 18-21 21 built

	L	I . g20	d1. If	0	0		. 060	I . hdO	l9Y2**	Fixed	Form
30		t. O04	35. 38	o	o		a	1. ooh	"	Fixed	Form
	L			0	0		0	.514	"	fixed	Form
32				0	0		0	2.153	"	Fixed	Form
33	I				.100		.200	.#5T	"	UrDan	Fixed Fora
3				.015	.200		.200	3.41b	"	Uroan	Fixed Forr
39		1.291	17.8z	.§6§	.628		.100	.200	"	Uroan
6	L	1.442	6.	0	0		0	1. 42	1973	fixed	Form
		2.oO9	24.OT	.#99		.300	.261	1.589	" Intersection Curves etc.
3		+.14T	?8.73	.i39		.160	.O88	.T§k	" Fixed Form
39		1.93	2P.O8	.59o		.18	.T8	. 8	*9T2** Jrban
40		2.84	16.4	. 2		. 4	.§4	.86	" ^Part^in^2^town: Hilly
41	I	0. 79	10. 3t	.20		0	0	.55	" Urba.o
42		t . pt	8. 9T	l.T	l	.*OO	0	.IOO	# T Intersection

TABLE IB

PC PRIMARY - JOBS WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY(Cont.)

Project Contractor Number Letter Code Code

Adjustment Bands

Miles Profile QR

Tested Index I l§-18 i8-?l
*OR & $P Year

21 Built Difficulty

3°#l9 2b.62

20 18 9 i.148 2.530

11.34T J.107 3.37T ^i7.$o8

9%

Urban

*Information not available for P.I. 21.01 to 24.00

**In ¹₉⁷² only random portions of projects were tested.

TABLE IIA

PC SECONDARY SLIP FORM - JOBS WITM SMALL ?V0UNT OF DIFFICULTY

Project Contractor

Number Letter Code Code

Miles

Tested
Profile Index

Adj us Amen I hands

lH 2R 3R

i5 iJ-i8 i8-21
4R 8 bR Year

21 Tested

	B B	3.*79 2.051	11.Y2 16.e8	2.65b .8kl	.300 .26a	.100 .too	.124 .3#3
		2.075		l.99#	.121	0
			5.*T	2.110	0	0	0
J8	E	2.85g		2.319	.200	.loo	.2LO	"
*9	E	§.0 2		2. 2	.100	0	0
50	E	2.172	lO.70	l.TOO	.300	.100	.072
51	E	2.13a		*. 93*	. 2OQ	0	0
b2		T.957	6.52			0	.IOO
53		2.0TO		l./§l	.100	.100
		2.080		. p8o	o	.100
		1.921		1.921	0	0	0
		j.103		3.'/O 3	.	300	too	^l9T3

.3 O

^J8 18.32

⁵⁹

5.201 .b00 i8.o6i .loo li.480 .200

.3oo

zoo

.332

.339

.063 ^!

.kl2

TADLE IIA

PC SECONDARY SLIP FORM - JOBS WITH SMALL AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY (Cont.)

Project Contractor

Number Letter Code Code

Miles Tested
Profile Index

Adjustment Bands

^{IR 2R} 3R

i i5-i8 i8-21

*4R % 5R Year

21 Tested

60 ^E

E

62 ^F

#3

11.849

1 .921

p. 8zo

^8.233 _L ^§g6 1.23

9.OY2 1.Y50 i.8t

6.6Ti .o88 o

8.270 .700 .3 0

.779

i.869

0

.TOO

113.226 .20

^{95.00b 7.210} 5.53²

3.9% . % .9%

*Information not available for P.I. 21.01 to 2#.00

**In l§/2 only random portions of projects were tested

***Less difficulty in portion tested

CONT CTOR TOTALS FROM TABLE IIA

Contractor	Tested	Index	lR	2R	3R	LR & 5R
F	2.08o	5.53	i.98		.100	0

Total Miles

Average -

Profile

5.?3⁰

13./1

8.i
67%

93/

.200

.7oo ^.t67

13% 9%

.332

2/

J ^4.027

.go8 8T/

.200

/%

.IOO

2%

.21a

6%

.324


^{E 3T . 02}3
4.18

.59
10.67

6.34

18.061 .100 .100 .0#3

99% .#% .#% .*%

^8. 9<sup>00 L . 100 . TOO . 8 39
26. 6/ 4</sup> . ^{1/ 6 3 . 27L 2. g6/}
4.o64 .121 0 O

TABLE HB

PC SECONDARY - JOBS WITH LARG1 AMOUNT OF DIFFICULTY

Project Contractor

dumber Letter Code Code

Miles Tested
Profile Index

Adjustment 9ands

lR 2R

i5 I -i8
_3R 4R 3: §R Year

18-21 21 Tested

.9T6

#3.95

0 0 .IOO . _{T6 +9T3}

^10/ 9OZ

TABLE III

Project Contractor

Number Letter Code Code
Miles

Tested

Profile Index

Adjustment Bands

lR 2R 3R

¹⁵ *5-^{18 i8-21}
*kR 8 51 rear

21 wilt

DRY

6

66

68

#9

}O Q

2.8i

2.077

I.8LL 2.105 #.33T

.7 9

6.oo

9.93

6. 88

8. 81

2.315 .3o0 .200 ⁰

2.OUT 0 0 0

i.644 .200 0 0

2.ooh .ioo o 0

*.33* 0 0 ⁰

0 ⁰

6.00 0 ⁰

*973

72 ^/.0?

_T3 2.0

	R	l.08s	.03		^1.^085		0		0			0			l@/2**
75		3.^0^5	. 6		3. o95		o		0			0
T6	T		6.86		4.249		.200		.100			0			*9T3
		1.103	12.#3		.703		.300		0			.l0O
8	S	3.5T9	10.02		3.1		.100		.100			.*39
2. J82				5.#3		0 . 1 3 1 . 500 9*.5% 3.5%				. TOO			#39

SECONDARY

/.0 0 0

1 . 9 . 500 ⁰

0

.100

1%

*Information not available for P.I. 21.01 to 24.OO

**In l9T2 only random portions of projects were tested