Lecture The problem of syntactic connections in traditional grammar

unаgreed depended composition. But, one can come to conclusion that there are the language forms expressing logical predicate in the structure of the sentence. In other case he refused his consideration and wrote that “ the verb is real and single way of studying predicate, to my mind, is wrong” (179-180).
It is known from above pointed that the predicate part of the sentence may be expressed by different parts of speech . The cause of existing some disputable ideas about the primary parts of sentence is that certain linguistic methods are not used while determining subject and predicate in linguistics. As we know Jigadlo and other put forward the idea of putting question or with the help of order of words the parts of 35

sentences are determined in theoretical and practical grammars ( Jigadlo, Ivanova, Iofik, 1956, 245-246).

Above pointed sources and ideas of linguists it is clear that primary parts of the sentence is divided into logical and grammatical parts. Grammatical parts and logical parts are connected with each other, but they have also differentiative features from each other. According to the such conclusions of linguists which after that there are two elements which expresses certain notion on the base of joining these two elements, i.e the subject and the predicate.
So, notion is about what, the imagination of that is the subject. Thinking about subject, said about the object of speech is the sign of predicate. According to this point, there are two parts of the sentence, i.e. subject corresponding to logical subject and the logical predicate corresponding to grammatical predicate. Such kind of things belong to only two member extended simple sentences. But there are other peculiarities in grammar. For example if we pay attention to the following sentences: My brother speaks English well- Mening akam inglizcha yaxshi gapiradi. So in both sentences my-mening- attribute, brother-akam-subject, speaks-gapiradi-predicate,