Warrants
Warrants are essentially call options issued by a firm. One important difference between
calls and warrants is that exercise of a warrant requires the firm to issue a new share of
stock—the total number of shares outstanding increases. Exercise of a call option requires
only that the writer of the call deliver an already-issued share of stock to discharge the
obligation. In that case, the number of shares outstanding remains fixed. Also unlike call
options, warrants result in a cash flow to the firm when the warrant holder pays the exer-
cise price. These differences mean that warrant values will differ somewhat from the val-
ues of call options with identical terms.
Like convertible debt, warrant terms may be tailored to meet the needs of the firm. Also
like convertible debt, warrants generally are protected against stock splits and dividends
in that the exercise price and the number of warrants held are adjusted to offset the effects
of the split.
Warrants are often issued in conjunction with another security. Bonds, for example,
may be packaged together with a warrant “sweetener,” frequently a warrant that may be
sold separately. This is called a detachable warrant.
Issue of warrants and convertible securities creates the potential for an increase in out-
standing shares of stock if exercise occurs. Exercise obviously would affect financial sta-
tistics that are computed on a per-share basis, so annual reports must provide earnings per
share figures under the assumption that all convertible securities and warrants are exer-
cised. These figures are called fully diluted earnings per share.
3
3
We should note that the exercise of a convertible bond need not reduce EPS. Diluted EPS will be less than undi-
luted EPS only if interest saved (per share) on the convertible bonds is less than the prior EPS.
bod61671_ch20_678-721.indd 704
bod61671_ch20_678-721.indd 704
7/25/13 2:50 AM
7/25/13 2:50 AM
Final PDF to printer
C H A P T E R
2 0
Options Markets: Introduction
705
The executive and employee stock options that became so popular in the 1990s
actually were warrants. Some of these grants were huge, with payoffs to top executives in
excess of $100 million. Yet firms almost uniformly chose not to acknowledge these grants
as expenses on their income statements until new reporting rules that took effect in 2006
required such recognition.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |