The Magnitude Issue
We noted that an investment manager overseeing a $5 billion
portfolio who can improve performance by only .1% per year will increase invest-
ment earnings by .001 3 $5 billion 5 $5 million annually. This manager clearly would
be worth her salary! Yet can we, as observers, statistically measure her contribution?
Probably not: A .1% contribution would be swamped by the yearly volatility of the
market. Remember, the annual standard deviation of the well-diversified S&P 500 index
has been around 20%. Against these fluctuations, a small increase in performance would
be hard to detect.
All might agree that stock prices are very close to fair values and that only managers of
large portfolios can earn enough trading profits to make the exploitation of minor mispric-
ing worth the effort. According to this view, the actions of intelligent investment managers
are the driving force behind the constant evolution of market prices to fair levels. Rather
than ask the qualitative question, Are markets efficient? we ought instead to ask a more
quantitative question: How efficient are markets?
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |