Investments, tenth edition



Download 14,37 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet286/1152
Sana18.07.2021
Hajmi14,37 Mb.
#122619
1   ...   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   ...   1152
Bog'liq
investment????

  Investor Risk 

Aversion (  A  )  

  Utility Score of Portfolio   L  

 [  E  (  r  ) 5 .07;  s  5 .05]  

  Utility Score of Portfolio   M  

 [  E  (  r  ) 5 .09;  s  5 .10]  

  Utility Score of Portfolio   H 

  [  E  (  r  ) 5 .13;  s  5 .20]  

 2.0 


 .07  2  ½  3  2  3  .05 

2

  5 .0675  



.09  2  ½  3  2  3  .1 

2

  5 .0800 



  .13  2  ½  3  2  3  .2 

2

  5 .09  

 3.5 


 .07  2  ½  3  3.5  3  .05 

2

  5 .0656 



  .09  2  ½  3  3.5 3 .1 

2

  5 .0725  

 .13  2  ½  3  3.5  3  .2 

2

  5 .06 


 5.0 

 .07  2  ½  3  5  3  .05 

2

  5 .0638 



  .09  2  ½  3  5  3  .1 

2

  5 .0650  

 .13  2  ½  3  5  3  .2 

2

  5 .03 


 Table 6.2 

 Utility scores of alternative portfolios for investors with varying degrees of risk aversion 

 Consider three investors with different degrees of risk aversion:  A  

1

  5 2,  A  



2

  5 3.5, and 

 A  

3

  5 5, all of whom are evaluating the three portfolios in  Table 6.1 . Because the risk-free 



rate is assumed to be 5%, Equation 6.1 implies that all three investors would assign a 

utility score of .05 to the risk-free alternative.  Table 6.2  presents the utility scores that 

would be assigned by each investor to each portfolio. The portfolio with the highest util-

ity score for each investor appears in bold. Notice that the high-risk portfolio,  H,  would 

be chosen only by the investor with the lowest degree of risk aversion,  A  

1

  5 2, while 



the low-risk portfolio,  L,  would be passed over even by the most risk-averse of our three 

investors. All three portfolios beat the risk-free alternative for the investors with levels of 

risk aversion given in the table. 

 Example  6.1 

Evaluating Investments by Using Utility Scores 

bod61671_ch06_168-204.indd   171

bod61671_ch06_168-204.indd   171

6/18/13   8:08 PM

6/18/13   8:08 PM

Final PDF to printer



172

P A R T   I I

  Portfolio Theory and Practice

 A portfolio has an expected rate of return of 20% and standard deviation of 30%. T-bills offer a safe rate 

of return of 7%. Would an investor with risk-aversion parameter  A  5 4 prefer to invest in T-bills or the 

risky portfolio? What if  A  5 2? 

 CONCEPT CHECK 


Download 14,37 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   ...   1152




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish