|
The train moved out of the city. Are you ready?
Put down the book.
Thus, concluding the above mentioned conceptions, there can be said that in any act ofcommunication there are three factors:
The act of speech;
The speaker;
Reality (as viewed by the speaker).
B. Khaimovich and Rogovskaya state that these factors are variable since they change with every actof speech. They may be viewed from two viewpoints:
From the point of view of language are constant because they are found in all acts ofcommunication;
They are variable because they change in every act of speech.
Every act of communication contains the notions of time, person, and reality.
The events mentioned in the communications are correlated in time and time correlation isexpressed by certain grammatical and lexical means.
Any act of communication presupposes theexistence of the speaker and the hearer. Themeaning of person is expressed by the category of theperson of verbs. They may be expressedgrammatically and lexico-grammatically by words: I, you, he...
Reality is treated differently by the speaker and this attitude of the speaker is expressed bythe category of mood in verbs. They may be expressed grammatically and lexically (may, must, probably...)
According to the same authors the three relations - to the act of speech, to the speaker andto reality - can be summarized as the relation to the situation of speech.
The relation of the thought of a sentence to the situation of speech is called predicativity.
Predicativity is the structural meaning of the sentence while intonation is the structural form of it. Thus, a sentence is a communication unit made up of words /and word-morphemes/ in conformitywith their combinability and structurally united by intonation and predicativity.
Within a sentence, the word or combination of words that contain the meanings ofpredicativity may be called the predication.
My father used to make nets and sell them.
My mother kept a little day-school for the girls. Nobody wants a baby to cry.
A hospital Nursery is one of the most beautiful places in the world. You might say, it’s aroom filled with love.
According to academician G. Pocheptsov, the sentence is the central syntactic construction used as the minimal communicative unit that has its primary predication, actualizes a definite structural scheme and possesses definite intonation characteristics. This definition works only in case we do not take into account the difference between the sentence and the utterance. The distinction between the sentence and the utterance is of fundamental importance because the sentence is an abstract theoretical entity defined within the theory of grammar while the utterance is the actual use of the sentence. In other words, a sentence is a unit of language while the utterance is a unit of speech.
The most essential features of the sentence as a linguistic unit are a) its structural characteristics – subject-predicate relations (primary predication), and
its semantic characteristics – it refers to some fact in the objective reality.
Thus, by sentence, we understand the smallest communicative unit, consisting of one ormore syntactically connected words that have primary predication and that have a certain intonationpattern.
There are many approaches to classify sentences. Below we shall consider only some of them. B. Ilyish classifies sentences applying two principles:
Types of communication. Applying this principle, he distinguishes 3 types of sentences: declarative, interrogative, imperative.
According to thestructure. Applying this principle, he distinguishes two main types ofsentences: simple and composite.
Ch. Fries gives an original classification of types of sentences. All the utterances are divided by him into Communicative and Non-communicative.
The Communicative utterances are in their turn divided into 3 groups:
Utterances regularly eliciting ―oral‖ responses only: greetings, calls, questions.
Utterances regularly eliciting "action" responses, sometimes accompanied by one of alimited list of oral responses: requests or commands.
Utterances regularly eliciting conventional signals of attention to continuous discourse statements.
L.Barkhudarov compares source (kernel) sentences with their transforms, he distinguishes several types of sentences from their structural view-point. His classification willrepresent binary oppositions where the unmarked member is the source kernel sentence andmarked one is the transformed sentence.
The most important oppositions within the limits of simple sentences are the following two:
Imperative (request) and non-imperative sentences.
Elliptical and non-elliptical sentences.
Summarizing the issue about the classification of sentences in the English language, wecan say that this can be done from different points of view. But the most important criteria so areas follow:
The criterion of the structure of sentences.
The criterion of the aim of the speaker.
The criterion of the existence of all parts of the sentence.
From the point of view of the first criterion, sentences fall under two subtypes: simple and composite. The difference between them is in the fact that simple sentences have one primary
predication in their structure while composite ones have more than one.
According to the criterion of the aim of the speaker, sentences fall under declarative, interrogative, imperative and exclamatory.
From the point of view of the existence of all parts of the sentence, we differentiateelliptical and non-elliptical sentences.
Generally, in all three compared languages sentences may be classified according to:
types of communication
structure.
According to the types of communication sentence in compared languages are divided into:
declarative,
interrogative
imperative.
A Declarative sentence states a fact in the affirmative or negative form. There are a number of difference between English and Russian, Uzbek negative sentences. An English sentence may have only one negation while the Russian sentence one may have more than one. (Nobody was late. – Никто неопоздал, Ҳеч ким кеч қолмади).Similarly, there can be observed a list of the ways of expressing negation in all three compared languages:
Means
|
English
|
Russian
|
Uzbek
|
1.
|
Grammatical
morpheme
|
do+not
|
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
