- 45 -
the project, being thoughtful at the moment of connecting the previous knowledge with
the new ones related to the Biology content.
Issues
It is important to highlight their commitment with the
different activities proposed, and
their attitude towards the challenge faced when they encounter themselves with difficult
topics, words or tasks. As this was a 33 students group, it is difficult to find the same
reaction and responses in the whole group. It was evidenced high stress situations,
reaching for moments the disinterest on the lesson. Due to the short time provided the
implementer tried in some cases to motivate those students
and get them back to the
topic; however, the main focus was to end the lesson fulfilling what was planned with
the less disciplinary issues as possible.
8.3 Students’ linguistic outcomes
One of the most relevant aspects was that students felt comfortable with the
reinforcement of both, content and English topics. For instance, in the first two classes,
they showed a proper general knowledge about possessive
adjectives making easier
the development of the lesson and optimizing the time for the tasks. This is the result of
a proper articulation between the English teacher and the researchers. As shown in the
different artifacts provided above, students made use of their different skills and
knowledge learnt in their L1 biology class and remembered
several aspects of the
English topic.
- 46 -
The implementation strategies of the researchers on one skill based lesson made easier
the analysis and observation of the different linguistic outcomes. Through this process,
the 4 linguistic skills (writing, reading, listening and speaking) were the focus of each
lesson. As evidenced in the second lesson where the listening test took place or the last
lesson in which there was a speaking activity to contrast and compare.
Assessment
The students did a summative assessment at the end of the project that contained the
three linguistic topics seen during the project time (possessive
adjectives and
comparatives and superlatives) and the two content biology topics (excretory system
and DNA and scientific thinking). The set of exercises on the assessment paper were
similar to the ones previously worked during the implementations (fill in the gaps,
multiple choices, completing a statement).
Issues
The main issues that were evidenced when grading the assessment was that according
the institutional
English schedule, the students were supposed to work on comparatives
and superlatives; however, in the day of the assessment the English teacher mentioned
that they never had the time and possibility to work on it. This meant that the students
faced that part of the assessment just with the few explanations given by the
implementer in two of the lessons.