42
Weber, T and Burrow. B. (2010) defines nonviolence as a 'weapon' available to all which
is least likely to destroy opponents and third parties. It beats the circle of violence and counter
violence as it gives the possibility of conversion. It is the surest way of achieving public sympathy.
They state that nonviolence is likely to produce a constructive rather than destructive outcome and
it's a method of conflict resolution that is aimed at the truth of a given situation
rather than a mere
victory for one side. They also view it as the only method of struggle that is consistent with the
teaching of major religions.
According to Weber and Burrow, nonviolence goes beyond the conviction that is a useful
or even the only 'correct' method of conflict resolution when employed. It can also be the basis for
a way of life. It is consistent with a belief in the underlying unity of humankind and it is the only
method of action, interpersonal or political that does not block that part to what has often been
referred to as 'self realization'.
Ayindo B., Doe S. and Jenner J. (2001) refer to nonviolence as a deliberate and calculated
effort to raise structural and covert conflict to the consciousness
of parties involved while
renouncing violence at the same time. Nonviolence as they put it perceives conflict as a product
of unjust structures in relationships and societies. They view nonviolence not as just absence of
violence, but as a positive and active potent force for attaining certain goals. They categorized
nonviolence into principled and pragmatic but concluded that both are not exclusive as they are
most times been utilized concurrently.
Peacebuilding:
Bliss S. (2010) has defined peacebuilding as a term within the international development
community used to describe the processes and activities involved in resolving violent conflicts and
establishing a sustainable peace. It includes
conflict transformation, restorative justice,
trauma
healing, reconciliation, development and leadership. She pointed out that it is similar to conflict
resolution but goes beyond seeking a sustainable social and economic development. More
importantly, it is about prevention of future wars and violence.
Gaulden P. (2004) refers to peacebuilding as the process of making sure that a country or
society creates a condition for sustainable peace. Such conditions can be created when a country
is already in a state of being peaceful. In such situation, the conditions
are created in order to
prevent conflict from erupting and therefore peace is sustained. The conditions can also be created
in post conflict situations.
43
This is done after a conflict must have been put to an end through a conflict resolution
mechanism. Under such a situation the process of peacebuilding begins with the transition period.
The various processes of implementing aspects of peace agreement become the process of peace
building. He further states that the process of peace building is a continuous one as it entails taking
various measures which include
transformation of state organs, socio-economic development,
democratization and regional integration.
In
his contribution, David J. (2006) refers to peacebuilding as efforts and interventions
aimed at overcoming the root causes of conflicts. According to him,
peacebuilding aims at
overcoming the structural, relational and cultural contradictions which are at the root of conflict in
order to underpin the processes of peacemaking and peacekeeping.
Peacebuilding as a concept is quite complex. In spite of its different definitions, the
underlying fact remains that peacebuilding is basically targeted
towards the realization of
atmosphere of positive peace, love and tranquility that is best for
human existence which will
enable man achieve the best life can bring (Okoye S., 2014).
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: