The Economist
September 5th 2020
Britain
21
1
A
t the start
of June, when England
took a big step out of lockdown, many
observers were nervous. Dissenting mem-
bers of the official Scientific Advisory
Group for Emergencies (
sage
) warned the
government that allowing people to min-
gle risked another flare-up. The new test-
and-trace system, intended to squash out-
breaks, had only just been established.
Polling found that the public believed min-
isters were being insufficiently cautious.
The government’s decision to ease re-
strictions was a gamble, but one that has
paid off. Following a small rise in July, the
Office for National Statistics’ infection sur-
vey, which tests a sample of people in Eng-
land and Wales each week, finds that the
number of cases has since remained flat.
Although there has been a gradual rise in
the number of positive test results, much
of this is accounted for by the fact that the
number of tests has increased, meaning
more asymptomatic cases are found and
false positives recorded. Hospital admis-
sions remain very low.
England has so far avoided the spikes
seen recently in France and Spain, mean-
ing it is now in a similar position to Ger-
many (see chart). A recent study found that
6% of people in England have antibodies,
which may offer some protection against
the virus. There is huge uncertainty about
the level at which herd immunity kicks in,
but even London—where the study found
13% of people had antibodies—appears
short of the most optimistic estimates.
The state has begun to do a better job at
preventing covid-19’s spread. The test-and-
trace system still has flaws, not least in the
time it takes to get results from tests. But
there is now a functioning system, which
helps suppress the growth of cases, as do
local restrictions where necessary. After a
weak start, Britain is now a testing heavy-
weight. Over the last week for which there
is data, it carried out 2.5 tests per 1,000 peo-
ple, compared with 1.7 in Spain and Ger-
many, and 1.8 in France.
Public caution has played a part in keep-
ing cases down, too. According to Google’s
mobility statistics, Britons are less likely to
have returned to work than those in other
big European countries; something the
government, concerned by the economic
implications, is now trying to change. John
Edmunds, an epidemiologist at the London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
and one of the dissenting
sage
members
when restrictions were eased, notes that
cross-country data imply “the release from
lockdown has resulted in larger changes to
at-risk behaviour [in Europe] than here.” It
is unclear why this is.
With children returning to school and
students to university, and people moving
indoors as the weather cools, keeping cases
down will soon become trickier. “I think al-
though we’ve got a lot of testing going on,
we probably don’t have anywhere near as
much as we will need to manage the next
month or so,” says Sir John Bell of the Uni-
versity of Oxford. There has been a worry-
ing jump in cases in Scotland, and it will be
difficult to avoid importing cases from
parts of Europe that are currently seeing
spikes, given the volume of summer travel.
Removing restrictions went better than ex-
pected in England. That does not mean
some will not have to be reimposed over
the coming months.
7
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: