Sexuality or Donna Haraway’s ‘A Cyborg Manifesto’.
14
Yet Christian true-
believers – however progressive – cannot admit to drawing their ethics from
Foucault and Haraway. So they go back to the Bible, to St Augustine and to
Martin Luther, and make a very thorough search. They read page after page
and story after story with the utmost attention, until they find what they need:
some maxim, parable or ruling that if interpreted creatively enough means that
God blesses gay marriages and that women can be ordained to the priesthood.
They then pretend the idea originated in the Bible, when in fact it originated with
Foucault. The Bible is kept as a source of authority, even though it is no longer a
true source of inspiration.
That’s why traditional religions offer no real alternative to liberalism. Their
scriptures don’t have anything to say about genetic engineering or artificial
intelligence, and most priests, rabbis and muftis don’t understand the latest
breakthroughs in biology and computer science. For if you want to understand
these breakthroughs, you don’t have much choice – you need to spend time
reading scientific articles and conducting lab experiments instead of memorising
and debating ancient texts.
That doesn’t mean liberalism can rest on its laurels. True, it has won the
humanist wars of religion, and as of 2016 it has no viable alternative. But its very
success may contain the seeds of its ruin. The triumphant liberal ideals are now
pushing humankind to reach for immortality, bliss and divinity. Egged on by the
allegedly infallible wishes of customers and voters, scientists and engineers
devote more and more energies to these liberal projects. Yet what the scientists
are discovering and what the engineers are developing may unwittingly expose
both the inherent flaws in the liberal world view and the blindness of customers
and voters. When genetic engineering and artificial intelligence reveal their full
potential, liberalism, democracy and free markets might become as obsolete as
flint knives, tape cassettes, Islam and communism.
This book began by forecasting that in the twenty-first century, humans will try
to attain immortality, bliss and divinity. This forecast isn’t very original or far-
sighted. It simply reflects the traditional ideals of liberal humanism. Since
humanism has long sanctified the life, the emotions and the desires of human
beings, it’s hardly surprising that a humanist civilisation will want to maximise
human lifespans, human happiness and human power. Yet the third and final
part of the book will argue that attempting to realise this humanist dream will
undermine its very foundations, by unleashing new post-humanist technologies.
The humanist belief in feelings has enabled us to benefit from the fruits of the
modern covenant without paying its price. We don’t need any gods to limit our
power and give us meaning – the free choices of customers and voters supply
us with all the meaning we require. What, then, will happen once we realise that
customers and voters never make free choices, and once we have the
technology to calculate, design or outsmart their feelings? If the whole universe
is pegged to the human experience, what will happen once the human
experience becomes just another designable product, no different in essence
from any other item in the supermarket?
Brains as computers – computers as brains. Artificial intelligence is now poised to surpass human
intelligence.
© VLADGRIN/Shutterstock.com.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |