31
150 basis points shift
upwards for the risk-free
yield curve. This is an extreme scenario given that
the 90th percentile yearly increase in the federal
funds rate has been around 127 basis points
since 2000.
76
These results are driven by the short durations
of assets held by (re)insurers in Bermuda. These
firms, which are mostly
active in the property and
casualty space, have liabilities of short duration
and therefore require short duration assets to
match. In addition to sovereign bonds, (re)insurers
are also active buyers of corporate bonds. As
was done in the previous exercise, the shocks
for corporate bonds’ different
rating classes are
applied, assuming constant credit spreads.
77
The
results can be found in Figure 3.2h.
As with the sovereign bond portfolio, the mean
and median curve have very little revaluation
effects on the corporate bond portfolios of
(re)insurers for all rating classes. The 95th
percentile curve produces losses between
2% and 5% on average.
However,
there are outliers
because some companies
have long duration corporate
bonds to match liabilities in
the casualty business, and
some may be conducting
life business as well. Overall,
the
revaluation effects are
different between rating
classes, as specific
(re)insurers prefer certain
durations for specific rating
classes. From the above
example,
AA and BBB-rated
securities are preferred
by a few longer-term
(re)insurers. The impact
of the portfolio’s revaluation on the companies’
solvency was estimated using a rough measure
of the probability that assets would be lower in
value than liabilities.
For all companies that were
stressed, this probability was estimated to be zero.
Although it is a rather crude measure, the
results of the exercise show that, on average,
the revaluation effects are manageable after a
sudden increase in interest rates in the Bermudan
property
and casualty sector, although some
outliers may need extra supervisory attention.
Although at higher interest rates there are
revaluation effects and fixed-income portfolios
lose value, as the older bonds mature and
(re)insurers purchase new ones with higher
coupon rates, their
investment income would
improve and the revaluation effect would be a
temporary strain that does not significantly affect
the longer-term survival of the firm. Of course,
this is more relevant for property and casualty
(re)insurers that do not have to lock in bonds for
long durations.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: