Genres, registers, text types, domains and styles: Clarifying the concepts and nevigating a path through the bnc jungle

 Medium I

Medium II (?) or

Interaction Type (?)

Super-genre or

Function

Genres or Sub-genres

face-to-face conversations

(90)

Private (100)

phone calls (10)

classroom lessons (20)

broadcast discussions (20)

broadcast interviews (10)

parliamentary debates (10)

legal cross-examinations (10)

Dialogue

(180)

Public (80)

business transactions (10)

spontaneous commentaries

(20)

unscripted speeches (30)

demonstrations (10)

Unscripted (70)

legal presentations (10)

broadcast talks (20)

Monologue

(100)

Scripted (30)

non-broadcast speeches (10)

broadcast news (20)

SPOKEN

(300)

Mixed

(20)

---

David Lee

Genres, Registers, Text Types, Domains, and Styles

Language Learning & Technology

50

student essays (10)

Non-professional

writing (20)

student examination scripts

(10)

social letters (15)

Non-Printed

(50)

Correspondence (30)

business letters (15)

humanities (10)

social sciences (10)

natural sciences (10)

Academic writing (40)

technology (10)

humanities (10)

social sciences (10)

natural sciences (10)

Non-academic writing

(40)

technology (10)

Reportage (20)

press news reports (20)

administrative/regulatory (10)

Instructional writing

(20)

skills/hobbies (10)

Persuasive writing

(10)

press editorials (10)

WRITTEN

(200)

Printed

(150)

Creative writing (20)

novels/stories (20)

The 

top row of the table

 is my attempt at describing what attribute(s) or levels the terms within each

column represent. The terms within the last column are what end-users of the corpus normally work with,

and can be seen to be either genres or sub-genres, viewed from a prototype perspective (e.g., "broadcast

interview" is probably best seen as a sub-genre of "interview," differing mainly in terms of the setting,

and business letters differ from social letters mainly in terms of domain). Most of the terms in the third

column can be said to describe "super-genre" or "super-super-genres," with the exception of "instructional

writing" and "persuasive writing" (shaded), which seem more like functional labels.

9

The British National Corpus (BNC), in contrast, has no text categorisation for written texts beyond that of

domain, and no categorisation for spoken texts except by "context" and demographic/socio-economic

classes. The following diagram shows the breakdown of the BNC:

Figure 4. Domains in the British National Corpus (BNC)

---

David Lee

Genres, Registers, Text Types, Domains, and Styles

Language Learning & Technology

51

It can be seen that for the written texts, domains are broad "subject fields" (see Burnard, 1995). These are

closely paralleled for the spoken texts by even broader "context" categories covering the major spheres of

social life (leisure, business, education, and institutional/public contexts). Apart from considering all the

demographically sampled conversations as constituting one super-genre of "casual conversation" and all

the written imaginative texts as forming a super-genre "literature," genres cannot easily be found at all

under the current domain scheme. More about these BNC categories and their (non-) usefulness will be

said in later sections.

Moving on to the LOB corpus (

Table 4

), we see that it is mostly composed of a mixture of genre and sub-

genre labels:

Table 4. Genres in the LOB Corpus