employers refused to let them be tested. Of course, I understood. No one likes
their authority to be questioned and it would be very embarrassing for a
serious news outlet to be shown to be employing
journalists who knew no
more than chimpanzees.
When people tell me things are impossible, that’s when I get really excited
to try. In my calendar for that year were two media conferences, so I took our
polling devices along. A 20-minute lecture is too short for all my questions,
but I could ask some. Here are the results. I also include in the table the
results from a conference of leading documentary film producers—people
from the BBC, PBS, National Geographic, the Discovery Channel, and so on.
It seems that these journalists and filmmakers know no more than the
general public, i.e., less than chimpanzees.
If this is the case for journalists and documentarians in general—and I have
no reason to believe knowledge levels would be higher among other groups of
reporters, or that they would have done better with other questions—then they
are not guilty. Journalists and documentarians are not lying—i.e., not
deliberately misleading us—when they produce dramatic reports of a divided
world, or of “nature
striking back,” or of a population crisis, discussed in
serious tones with wistful piano music in the background. They do not
necessarily have bad intentions, and blaming them is pointless. Because most
of the journalists and filmmakers who inform
us about the world are
themselves misled. Do not demonize journalists: they have the same mega
misconceptions as everyone else.
Our press may be free, and professional, and truth-seeking, but independent
is not the same as representative: even if every report is itself completely true,
we can still get a misleading picture through the sum of true stories reporters
choose to tell. The media is not and cannot be neutral, and we shouldn’t
expect it to be.
The journalists’ poll results are pretty disastrous.
They are the knowledge
equivalent of a plane crash. But it is no more helpful to blame the journalists
than it is to blame a sleepy pilot. Instead, we have to seek to understand why
journalists have a distorted worldview (answer: because they are human
beings, with dramatic instincts) and what systemic factors encourage them to
produce skewed and overdramatic news (at least part of the answer: they must
compete for their consumers’ attention or lose their jobs).
When we understand this we will realize that it is completely unrealistic
and unfair to call for the media to change in this way or that so that it can
provide us with a better reflection of reality.
Reflecting reality is not
something the media can be expected to do. You should not expect the media
to provide you with a fact-based worldview any more than you would think it
reasonable to use a set of holiday snaps of Berlin as your GPS system to help
you navigate around the city.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: