w w w. m u s e u m . u p e n n . e d u / e x p e d i t i o n
23
S
cores from a 2002 standardized Reading Proficiency Test for
fourth graders surprised the principal of Wensleydale
Elementary School (pseudonym). Her school is typical for its
urban Ohio district, sharing all the issues of funding, staffing,
unions, uneven student background and preparedness, and
decaying facilities faced by other urban, public schools in the U.S. The principal knew that a
statistical “race” gap in student scores might indicate socioeconomic differences within the
school’s catchment area. She also expected a gender gap—on average, girls perform better
than boys on tests like this one. Both gaps were indeed present in Wensleydale’s fourth grade
test score data. However, the principal was taken aback by two things. First, the gender gap
was much larger than expected—boys demonstrated proficiency at a rate 34% lower than
girls. The second surprise came when she compared Wensleydale with other schools in the
district. Wensleydale boys were 9% below the district average for boys, while Wensleydale
girls performed on average 19% higher than other district girls. These findings were con-
firmed when the principal examined her teachers’ classroom evaluations of students’ read-
ing—as a group the girls were racing ahead, the boys lagging behind.
Several years earlier, in response to declining test scores in the public school system overall,
district officials had asked schools to develop improvement plans. The staff at Wensleydale
focused their energies on improving their reading and math programs, adding writing and sci-
ence as a second tier of emphasis. This involved implementing several new reading-enhance-
ment plans. They hired a reading specialist with Title I funding and adopted 100 Book
Challenge
tm
, a commercial reading program described below. They joined OhioReads, a state
initiative in which community volunteers assist children who read below grade level. They
hosted authors and storytellers, and students and teachers participated in read-a-thons. The
school’s PTA also developed a highly successful annual book fair that aimed to put at least one
new book in every child’s hands. Reading gained an enormous profile in the school’s public
spaces: walls were covered with reading recognition notices as were lockers and designated
spaces in each classroom. Just after the Pledge of Allegiance each morning, the loudspeaker
announced those students who had reached individual 100 Book Challenge
tm
goals.
At
the end of a spring day, girls head
home to homework, television, read-
ing, friends, and playing outside. The
top five activities ranked by boys
were television, eating, homework,
playing outside, and video games.
Carolyn B
ehrman
24
vo lu m e 4 6 , n u m b e r 3 e x p e d i t i o n
Carolyn B
ehrman
Given all this attention to reading, the test scores and eval-
uations were especially troubling. When the scores were made
public I approached the principal and proposed a collabora-
tive service-learning research project to describe the school’s
“culture of reading” and examine the ways it might be empha-
sizing differing behaviors based on gender. In the spring of
2003 undergraduates taking my advanced course in anthropo-
logical research methods teamed up with fourth graders and
their teachers to study the “culture of reading” at Wensleydale
Elementary School.
STUDYING THE “CULTURE OF READING”
A culture, broadly speaking, is an integrated pattern of behav-
ior, practices, beliefs, and knowledge. These constitute the
operating rules by which people organize themselves. Though
all members of a culture do not do exactly the same things,
play the same roles, or understand their culture in precisely
the same ways, they do all participate and thereby create and
maintain the basic rules of the culture.
In studying the culture of reading, our aim was to describe
the integrated pattern of reading behavior, practices, beliefs,
and knowledge, and to understand how the staff and students
actively created and maintained this pattern. To do this we
needed to examine the physical space, the shared activities,
and the individual behaviors and beliefs of the participants as
they related to reading. Our goal was to describe these features
and examine how they varied, and specifically to see how gen-
der operated as a variable.
The undergraduates began their semester studying ethno-
graphic and other research methods and learning about rele-
vant issues in literacy and the teaching of reading. During this
The PTA of the school sponsored an annual Scholastic Bookfair and
contributed the proceeds to purchase books for each child and to improve
classroom resources.
Service-learning
and Ethnography
O
ne of my teaching goals is to
enable university students to
step outside their habitual
ways of viewing the world
and see patterns of culture in
the familiar world around them. In a service-
learning class, course materials and student
energies are brought to bear on a specific,
community-generated issue or question.
Service-learning is both an academic and a
civic experience that should further the stu-
dents’ skills and knowledge. This experience is
achieved through a sustained engagement
between community partners and students
working together to address a primary issue
or question such as: How do we describe a
“culture of reading,” and in what ways can
such a culture be considered to be ‘gendered’?
Courses like this present challenges. First,
trust had to be developed between the univer-
sity faculty and students and Wensleydale’s
staff, students, and parents. Both groups
needed to be confident that their interests and
work would be respected. Second, our find-
ings had to contribute to the school’s overar-
ching objective to improve reading profi-
ciency, and our research activities had to
dovetail with daily routines in the school. The
adage we set for ourselves was “first do no
harm and then make no unnecessary work for
the partners.” Third, the plan had to include
instruction for the undergraduates on clearly
defined course material, while engaging the
partners in the research process in a way that
fit with their pre-existing activities and goals.
Finally, protocols for the ethical treatment of
human subjects had to be followed. Both the
university’s and the public school system’s
approval for our activities and interviews had
to be obtained to conduct research with
school children. We developed a coherent
project proposal months before the service-
learning course began in order to acquire
these approvals but it needed to be flexible
and comprehensive enough to accommodate
the project plan created by students and com-
munity partners during the semester.
w w w. m u s e u m . u p e n n . e d u / e x p e d i t i o n
25
Carolyn B
ehrman
time they met with the Wensleydale teachers’ planning com-
mittee. Together they agreed on three main tracks for the
research. These are characterized by the methods used and
types of data collected, and were undertaken by separate teams
of undergraduates.
PARTICIPANT-OBSERVATION
Participant-observation is the foundation of ethnographic
inquiry. On the surface, the term