2.3 Spray Characterisation
56
result in lower droplet size. Moreover, according to Sazhin et al. [144]
increased
droplet surface temperature reduces the surface tension resulting in increased
vaporisation speeds and hence smaller droplets.
2.3.2.3
Empirical Relationships
Several experimental studies have been carried out to establish a relationship
between different fuel and injection properties and the droplet size. According to
Lefebvre [7], owing to the complexity of various physical phenomena involved, much
research into droplet sizing follows empirical methods. Five equations for the Sauter
Mean Diameter have been displayed in Table 2.3.
It is clear from the equations that the importance
of viscosity compared to
surface tension on droplet size is much larger. The equations are mainly aimed at
estimating droplet sizes in diesel sprays and might prove inaccurate when applied to
other fuels, especially those with higher volatility characteristics. Also, the equations
do not take into account of the location of the measuring point and try and estimate a
global droplet size. As will be shown in later chapters, measurement location affects
the droplet size. Further, the established relationships are derived from a given set of
experiments and are highly dependent upon achieving same conditions. The effect of
injection pressure is relatively close between Elkotb and Knight but greatly reduced
for the case of Hiroyasu and Kodota [143].
Moreover, although pressure difference across the nozzle
is expected to affect
the SMD, Araneo et al. [145] found flash boiling to have a significant effect, especially
at below atmospheric ambient conditions, whereas above 800 kPa ambient pressure
did not affect SMD further. Wang and Lefebvre [146] found the ambient pressure
increase above atmospheric to increase the size of
droplets to a maximum value
initially before a decline. This would suggest that the ΔP term in the presented
equations is limited in its range which, however, is not demonstrated in the equations.
Lefebvre [7] and Wang and Lefebvre [147] also
argue that the liquid sheet
disintegration at exit from an injector nozzle is in addition to aerodynamic forces
affected by turbulent or other disruptive forces within the liquid itself and proposed
Equation 2.11. They acknowledge, however, the difficulty arising from experimental
difficulties of measuring the liquid film thickness for purposes of the analysis.
It is evident all researches only fit the equation to their specific experiments
and admit different relationship might be more appropriate
compared to other
2.3 Spray Characterisation
57
researchers. The accuracy/suitability of the relationships presented will be compared
against the current study in Section 5.1.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: