Regional profile: Saarland
GDP per head (2000)
DEC Saarland: 22.668 €434 (average of old Länder incl. Berlin: 26.426 € and excl. Berlin: 26.637 €)435
Germany436 24.700 €
EU-15 = 100; DEC = 96,8437
GDP at current prices/in Million € (2000)
DEC Saarland438: 24.248
Germany439: 2.030.000
EU-15440: 8.524.371
Employment rate (2000)441
450.200 person in gainful employment = 68,6% (German average = 68,8%)
Unemployment rate (2002)
DEC Saarland: 10,8 % 442 (German average: 9,8%; West 7,9%, East: 18,0%)
Technological standing (5 point scale): 3,3
Strengths [short description]443
The Saarland is, at 2.570 km², the smallest German (non-city) state with regard to surface area. Located in the centre-west, the region is populated by 1.065.082 (in 2002) inhabitants. Regarding its infrastructure the state benefits from its railroad network (rapid rail lines along with the new generation of fast trains) and the direct connection with the French railway system in Saarbrücken. The state has one airport (incl. air freight services) and a dense motorway and road network. Additionally, the river Saar provides for waterway traffic and transport.
The state is often referred to as a bridge to other European states such as France and Luxembourg and for trans-European business in general. Thus, a large percentage of the workforce is employed in trans-border activities. 87% of the employees (for which social insurance contributions are paid) live in the state. Over 25.000 persons from other German States (esp. Rhineland-Palatinate), come to work in Saarland each day. Also 21.000 commuters from abroad, especially France, are working in the state. With a view to its commuters´ balance there is still a surplus of commuters into Saarland (more than 23.000 jobs to people from neighbouring regions).
Besides traditionally important branches like logistics or the automotive industry (Ford AG), the Saarland pays particular attention to emerging high-technology sectors like pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Given Saarland´s special cultural and tourist attractions, also the tourism sector is a relevant business area. The largest economic sector in terms of employment is the service sector, followed by production, processing industry, trade and commerce, production of motor vehicles and components, regional corporations and social insurances, the building sector, communications and ICT, metal production and –processing as well as mechanical engineering. Saarland’s industrial area follows the river Saar, while the more rural northern part of Saarland is covered by wood and forests. This area serves as a short-distance leisure zone of the densely populated industrial zones.
Its centrality as well as the low cost structure, the financial assistance and technology transfer strengthens the economic development of the state. Moreover, it supported the development of "European skills", which additionally facilitate trans-border business activities. Especially the Saar-Lor-Lux region is a good example in this context (agriculture: 2%; commerce and communications: 20%; production: 31%; services: 47%).
The trend towards the establishment of trans-border co-operation between universities and research institutions in the Saar-Lor-Lux region is increasing. Thus, over 5.000 scientists are integrated in such co-operations. The French-German University, 5 public institutions of higher education (University of the Saarland, University of the Saarland/Medical School, Polytechnic College, Conservatory of Music, and Academy of Arts College of Social Work), 1 Max-Planck institute and 2 Fraunhofer installations are located here. In 1974, the Saarland University started the enlargement of application-oriented fields of research. Out of this an attractive environment for the relocation of numerous research institutes close to the university has developed.
In 1999 the state held rank 13 in investment per employee in the processing industry.444
Companies: AlliedSignal, AOL, Chamberlain, DePuy, FiberTechGroup, Ford, Intermet, Johnson Controls, Lands’ End, Scott, Whirlpool.
Weaknesses [short description]445
Small size; high dependence on commuters from other regions; relatively high unemployment rate, low employment rate; low degree of investments
Evolution in last decade [short description]
Employment has been slightly growing with constant ups and downs during this period (1992: 482.300, 2002: 505.600) and the same holds true for the GDP/per capita (1992: 19.539 €, 2002: 23.878 €).446
The structural changes initiated during the 1980ies concentrated on the creation of sectors like Energy technology, food industry, automotive industry, ICT and tourism. Employment decreased significantly in the mining as well as in the iron and steel processing industry. Meanwhile two third of all workplaces in the Saarland belong to the service sector. Especially the economy of the SAAR-LOR-LUX region, but also the rest of the state, is characterised by a structural change from a region formerly dominated by coal and steel towards a service-oriented economy. Especially the relevance of the steel producing sector decreased. During the 1990ies the Völklinger Saarstahl AG (a large employer) went bankrupt. The Saarstahl AG (originating in the bankrupt) went into state property to secure the further existence of the steel industry. In view of the mining sector (esp. hard coal) production circumstances changed a lot due to the ‘Artikelgesetz’ (article law) and the coal compromise (successive decrease of state subventions for coal form ca. 5 bio. € to ca. 2.7 bio. € in 2005) in 1997. These instruments will cause the loss of about 6.000 workplaces. To compensate these losses the state is subsidised by the Federal government (ca. 1.4 bio €) until 2005.
A structural university reform has been finalised in 2000 closing down some not very prominent areas, concentrating on interdisciplinary fields and strengthening the cooperation with neighbouring universities.
Further indicators
Public revenue and spending (€)447
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
Revenue
|
3.193.407.200
|
3.146.288.500
|
3.004.060.500
|
Spending
|
3.356.084.200
|
3.364.793.100
|
3.382.473.200
|
Employment (at workplace) per sector448
Agriculture:
2002: 1.564
|
Industry (without building and construction trade):
2002: 115.314
|
Building and construction trade:
2002: 21.390
|
Trade, tourism, transportation:
2002: 77.186
|
Public and private services:449
2002: 137.973
|
Industrial Structure
Branches of industry450
Branch
|
Employment figures 2002
|
|
|
Food and tobacco
|
8.100
|
Textile
|
398
|
Timber
|
774
|
Paper, printing, publishing
|
2.241
|
Chemical industry
|
794
|
Rubber and synthetic material
|
5.486
|
Glas, ceramic, working of stone and earth
|
4.246
|
Metal (production, working, ..)
|
43.932
|
Mechanical engineering
|
12.925
|
Production of equipment for the production of electricity
|
3.463
|
Production of office machines, ICT techniques, optical equipment tv,…
|
3.065
|
Vehicle production
|
225.007
|
Furniture, jewellery, musical instruments, sports equipment, toys, recycling
|
1.155
|
Recycling
|
134
|
Research base Employment in education, higher education and research451
Public expenditure on science and research (mio. €)452
2001
|
826,6
|
2002
|
847,2
|
2003
|
876,8
|
Students at universities453
|
Beginners (included in total number)
|
Total number of
|
Wintersemester 2000/01
|
3.004
|
19.970
|
Summersemester 2002
|
307
|
18.857
|
Wintersemester 2001/02
|
3.270
|
20.150
|
Summersemester 2002
|
355
|
18.954
|
Infrastructure (categories of streets)454
Category
|
Motorway (Autobahn)
|
Road network
|
Total
|
Kilometres
|
236
|
1.795
|
2.031
|
Vehicles
1999455
|
690.338
|
2000456
|
701.288
|
2001457
|
728.338
|
2001458
|
741.922
|
2003459
|
746.185
|
Doctors and dentists (2000)460
Doctors
|
4.020
|
Dentists
|
658
|
Designation for principal domestic policy support instruments (5 point scale): 2,5
Territorial Policy
|
2,5
|
Public sector transfer
|
2,5
|
Employment policy
|
3
|
Technology policy
|
2
|
Saarland461
SL
|
Fiscal resources before SHES (in Mio. DM)
|
Divergence from national average (balance measurement)
(= 100)
|
Contribution / assignment within SHES
(in Mio. DM)
|
Fiscal resources after SHES
(in Mio. DM)
|
Divergence from national average (balance measurement)
(= 100)
|
Supplementary federal grants (in Mio. DM)
|
Fiscal resources after SHES and Gap-filling grants
(in Mio. DM)
|
Divergence from national average (balance measurement)
(= 100)
|
Gap-filling grants
|
Compensations for special political costs
|
Compensations for special burdens
(east Germany)
|
Transitional grants
(west Germany)
|
Rehabilitational grants Bremen and Saarland
|
SFH total
|
1995
|
4.019
|
90.9
|
180
|
4.199
|
95.0
|
199
|
153
|
0
|
80
|
1.600
|
2.032
|
4.398
|
99.5
|
1996
|
4.017
|
89.8
|
234
|
4.251
|
95.0
|
201
|
153
|
0
|
72
|
1.600
|
2.026
|
4.452
|
99.5
|
1997
|
4.010
|
90.4
|
204
|
4.214
|
95.0
|
200
|
153
|
0
|
64
|
1.600
|
2.017
|
4.414
|
99.5
|
1998
|
4.185
|
90.1
|
228
|
4.413
|
95.0
|
209
|
153
|
0
|
56
|
1.600
|
2.018
|
4.622
|
99.5
|
1999*
|
4.315
|
88.9
|
294
|
4.609
|
95.0
|
218
|
153
|
0
|
48
|
1.200
|
1.619
|
4.827
|
99.5
|
2000*
|
4.402
|
88.4
|
329
|
4.731
|
95.0
|
224
|
153
|
0
|
40
|
1.050
|
1.467
|
4.955
|
99.5
|
2001
|
4.134
|
88.9
|
286
|
4.420
|
95.0
|
209
|
153
|
0
|
32
|
900
|
1.294
|
4.629
|
99.5
|
*) preliminary
Impact on ex-ante divergence from national average of support from EU funds (7 point scale): 2,9
|
|
2000-2006 (mio €)
|
|
|
|
ERDF
|
ESF
|
EAGGF
|
|
|
Total
|
EU contribution
|
EU contribution
|
%
|
EU contribution
|
%
|
EU contribution
|
%
|
Objective 2
|
Saarland
|
981.785
|
171.089
|
130.841
|
76.48%
|
40.248
|
23.52%
|
-
|
-
|
Impact on ex-ante divergence from national average of domestic policies (7 point scale): 3,7
Change in standing of region relative to national average in last five and ten years462
|
1991
|
1996
|
2001
|
GDP/capita (€)
|
18.965
|
20.532
|
23.218
|
Population
|
1.074.700
|
1.083.500
|
1.067.300
|
Employment (persons)
|
481.100
|
477.200
|
511.500
|
Unemployment (persons)
|
35.981
|
52.065
|
44.906
|
Unemployment rate
|
8,6
|
12,4
|
9,8
|
|
1995
|
1997
|
1999
|
R+D expenditure (mio €)463
|
204
|
219
|
227
|
Estimated effect on regional circumstances of different domestic policies:
|
Strongly positive
|
Slightly positive
|
Neutral
|
Slightly negative
|
Strongly negative
|
Territorial Policy
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Public sector transfer
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Employment policy
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Technology policy
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |